Procedural Issues Concerning Environmental Damage In Ecuador
Journal Title: Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho - Year 2010, Vol 2, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper aims to determine, through a deep analysis of different doctrines, the definition of environmental damage; it also seeks to determine the difference between damage to nature and the civil environmental damage, which is damage to individual interests or collective environmental event occasion. To this purpose, we intend to study certain procedural rules and case law concerning Ecuadorian environmental management, also in comparative law considers how countries like Chile, Spain and Argentina regulate compensation and repair environment.
Authors and Affiliations
René Bedón Garzón
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP36047
- DOI https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v2i0.15
- Views 468
- Downloads 0
NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE NEO-CONSTITUTIONALISM
The term “neoconstitucionalism” is quite ambiguous: contemporary culture uses it to denote such as heterogeneous things as a form of state, a policy of judicial activism, a theoretical account of contemporary legal syste...
DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION AND CITIZENS AS A MECHANISM FOR OVERCOMING THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS IN THE BRAZILIAN LEGAL CONTEXT
This paper aims to investigate the importance of application the right to democratic and citizen participation in overcoming the ecological crisis. Democratic participation is a fundamental right of every citizen. Thus,...
LITIGATING INTEREST
This paper aims to clarify the concept of procedural interest and systematize the different kinds of interest required by the laws of our legal system (legitimate interest, direct, serious, diffuse, collective, mutual, g...
SOBRE LA INJUSTICIA DEL ABORTO
Abortion is seen as an immoral and unjust act by many. Nonetheless these views are under pressure to conform to the learned opinion on abortion. A variety of prestigious in the field of applied ethics support abortion in...
MOST COMMON SIX ERRORS ON LEGAL INTERPRETATION IN ECUADOR
The main purpose of this work is to correct the misconception prevailing in culture of the Ecuadorian legal interpretation of the law. For this, the author through constructive criticism, show six misconceptions quite...