PROHIBITION OF TORTURE AT INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC LEVELS MIGAL ROMAN VASILYEVICH

Journal Title: «Приватне та публічне право» - Year 2018, Vol 3, Issue

Abstract

In the article, the author criticizes the norms of legislation of Ukraine, as well as different countries in the context of protecting human rights against torture. Particular attention is paid to special international legal acts. It is proved that each State party is using effective legislative, administrative, judicial and other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction. No exceptional circumstances, whatever they may be, a state of war or a threat to war, internal political instability or any other state of emergency, cannot serve as justification for torture. And the order of the supreme commander or state authority cannot serve as justification for torture. Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are considered as criminal offenses under its criminal law. The same can be said of an attempt to torture and to act against any person who is complicity or participation in torture. Particular emphasis is placed on the fact that participation in the Convention provides for the establishment of appropriate penalties for such crimes, given their grave nature. States also undertake to prevent, in any territory under its jurisdiction, other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment that do not fall under the definition of torture when committed by public officials, another person , acting in their official capacity, with their incitement, with their knowledge or tacit consent.

Authors and Affiliations

Р. В. Мигаль

Keywords

Related Articles

CONSIDERATION OF THE CASE FOR A RATIONAL TIME AS A DETERMINANT ELEMENT OF FAIR LEGAL PRODUCTION

This article is devoted to the study of practical issues of fair trial in the context of adapting the developments of the European Court of Human Rights to the Ukrainian national judicial system. The content of the terms...

LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE SUPERVISION AND CONTROL FOR THE EXERCISE OF LEGISLATION ON LABOR LAWS OF LABOR AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS

Discussions regarding the legal nature of the legal regulation of state supervision and control over the observance of labor legislation call for the consideration of the issue of labor relations and administrative issue...

TACTICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF CONDUCTING INTERROGATION OF MINORS AND JUVENILES

The article is devoted to the study of social relations that arise during the interrogation of minors and juveniles. Particular attention is paid to the content of psychological contact and tactical techniques of interac...

DEVELOPMENT OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE AS SOURCES OF RIGHTS IN UKRAINE AND PROSPECTS OF APPLICATION IN CIVIL PROCESS

The article is devoted to the definition of the concept of judicial practice, in particular, in the context of its application as a source of law in Ukraine. Possible forms of expression of judicial practice are consider...

INFORMATION AND LEGAL STATUS OF EXECUTIVE BODIES OF UKRAINE AS A COLLECTIVE LEGAL ENTITY OF INFORMATION LAW

The article is devoted to the coverage of one of the urgent problems of information law in analyzing doctrinal approaches to the definition of “executive body”, “information and legal status” and clarifying the nature, c...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP592514
  • DOI -
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Р. В. Мигаль (2018). PROHIBITION OF TORTURE AT INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC LEVELS MIGAL ROMAN VASILYEVICH. «Приватне та публічне право», 3(), 72-75. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-592514