Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 30/14
Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 3
Abstract
In the proposed draft position the author points to the incompatibility with Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution of Article 75 § 4 of the Act – Law on Common Courts System, in so far as it denies the right of appeal to the court against the decision of the Minister of Justice rejecting the request from a judge to be moved to a different place of office. The decision of the Minister, based on his/her own discretion, should be subject to judicial review, as it is taken neither within the scope of administrative supervision over the courts, nor even by means of official superiority, but rather relates to the systemic position of a judge determined by his/her rights and obligations. In the opinion of the author, Article 75 § 1 of the above Act, in so far as it does not specify the conditions for move to another post, is in conformity with Article 47, Article 52 para. 1, Article 65 para. 1 in conjunction with Article 31 para. 3 of the Constitution. This provision contains a mechanism that properly balances the public interest and private interest. On the one hand, it allows the change of place of adjudication established in the appointment document, providing an exception to the principle of stabilization of the office of judge. On the other hand, it guarantees an efficient and fair administration of justice.
Authors and Affiliations
Dorota Lis-Staranowicz
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP348081
- DOI -
- Views 59
- Downloads 0
Wykładnia art. 47 ust. 2 pkt 1 regulaminu Sejmu – tryb rozpatrywania poprawek w komisjach
The analysis concerns the issue of whether a committee considering, based on the indicated provision, amendments submitted during the second reading, should vote on their acceptance or rejection separately for each amend...
Ocena petycji Andrzeja Halickiego w sprawie nowelizacji ustawy o petycjach w zakresie zamieszczania odpowiedzi na petycję na stronie internetowej podmiotu rozpatrującego petycję oraz zmiany terminu przekazania petycji podmiotowi właściwemu do jej rozpatrzenia
In the author’s opinion the proposed amendments are reasonable and admissible as concerns a legislator’s discretion. Such amendment would lead to making proceedings with petitions more transparent and may eliminate an in...
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykorzystywania środków finansowych przeznaczonych na zatrudnianie pracowników z wykształceniem prawniczym w biurze klubu poselskiego na obsługę prawną świadczoną przez kancelarię prawną i rozliczania tych usług fakturą VAT
Funds available for parliamentary clubs „for employment in the Deputies’ office or a parliamentary club office an employee with legal higher education to support the club’s activities related to the lawmaking process” ca...
Instytucjonalizacja związków partnerskich w świetle art. 18 i 32 Konstytucji RP
Statutory institutionalization of civil partnerships stirs up large controversies and considerable disputes in the public debate. Legal arguments appearing in the discussion regard Article 18 and Article 32 of the Consti...
Dokument otwierający debatę na temat przyszłości europejskiej obronności
The submitted document opens the debate on the future of European defence. In the present geostrategic context, it is advisable that the European Union should increase its military potential by, inter alia, reducing the...