Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 4/16
Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2017, Vol 53, Issue 1
Abstract
This draft position of the Sejm concerns the constitutional complaint of 13th August 2015. In the proposed draft position the author claims that the Article 107 paragraph 1 of the Act of 27th July 2001 – the Law on the System of Common Courts is in compliance with the Article 42 para. 1 sentence no. 1 in conjunction with the Article 2 of the Constitution. The author states that the challenged provision does not infringe the principle of specificity of law, and that the nullum crimen sine lege principle is applicable to the disciplinary proceedings only in a suitable way. Moreover, he claims that in the remaining scope of the complaint the proceedings should be discontinued pursuant to Article 40 para. 1 subpara. 1 of the Act on the Constitutional Tribunal due to the inadmissibility of the judgment.
Authors and Affiliations
Krzysztof J. Kaleta
Opinia prawna na temat poselskiej inicjatywy ustawodawczej w odniesieniu do ustaw regulujących stosunek państwa do kościołów i związków wyznaniowych
Legal opinion on the Deputies’ legislative initiative with regard to the laws governing the relations of the state with churches and religious organizations: The opinion deals, in particular, with the relationship betwee...
Upublicznienie dzienników urzędowych wydanych przez władze Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej na uchodźstwie w latach 1939–1990 w kontekście obowiązującego porządku prawnego, z uwzględnieniem m.in. Konstytucji kwietniowej
The author presents historical a background and events which led to the existence of the Polish authorities on exile as well as publications of Polish legal acts during the World War II, in the post-war period and nowada...
Dopuszczalność dowodów – wniosek Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich (sygn. akt K 27/16) dotyczący ustawy – Kodeks postępowania karnego
The object of the Constitutional Tribunal’s review is Article 168a of the Code indicating the reasons of inadmissibility of evidence. The draft Sejm’s position contains a conclusion that the above provision is consistent...
Wykładnia art. 184 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu – przedmiot wniosku formalnego
The discussed Article specifies the acceptable subject matter of points of order. The assumption that they may concern matters being the subject of orders of the day and the course of sittings means that the subject mat...
Przekroczenie granic obrony koniecznej – w sprawie propozycji nowelizacji art. 25 Kodeksu karnego
The author of the petition postulates the introduction of Article 25 para. 3a of the Criminal Code, in which the privilege of impunity for a person crossing the borders of necessary defense in a situation of defense agai...