Pros and Cons of National Health Insurance Fund in Sudan: A Critical Review
Journal Title: Journal of Quality in Health Care & Economics (JQHE) - Year 2021, Vol 4, Issue 5
Abstract
Introduction: National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) is a semi-autonomous and national organization which is politically affiliated to Ministry of labor and social security and Woman and Child Affairs. NHIF is pointing to mitigate the risks of high cost of health services on both the government and population and securing the quality and accessibility of health services. Aim: this review is aiming to identify, and summarize the findings of relevant studies on the factors that affect NHIF in Sudan to be more accessible for decision makers to take a strategic decisions towards the universal health coverage. Methods: a qualitative exploratory analytical study. The study conducted on National Health Insurance Fund in Khartoum State. The study population was composed of the current literature that clarifying the research question. This study used SALSA framework: the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis framework which is a simple framework divides the review process into four main stages: (1) search (2) appraisal (3) synthesis and (4) analysis. Results: One of NHIF strengthen that it has a large coverage of population but it has low utilization of services by subscribers which considered as threat. Safeguarding health service users especially the poor against the implication of the market liberation policy embarked on by the Sudanese government is considered as opportunity to ensure the financial risk protection at NHIF but existence of The Federal Ministry of Finance as the major contributor in financing NHIF is a threat faces NHIF sustainability. Conclusion: This critical review shows that National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) affected by many internal and external favorable and unfavorable factors. Those factors are: strengthens, weaknesses, opportunities, threats of NHIF which should be taken in consideration to achieve universal health coverage.
Authors and Affiliations
Mohamed Osman Babiker, Habbani Khalid, Kheir Sara Gabrallah M and Mousnad MM*
Invoking the Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 was a Jugaad Approach to Systemic Crises Like Covid 19 Pandemic in India
The world’s most trusted English dictionary Oxford has officially accepted the word ‘Jugaad’ in their 2017 update. According to the dictionary, noun Jugaad means a flexible approach to solve a problem that uses limite...
Back to Medical Ethics
Although nobody much reads the original Hippocratic Oath any more, it is essentially a commitment to keeping trade secrets.
Coronavirus and State Actions: Questions By and For Policy Planners and Analysts
The coronavirus outbreak and crisis has a wide range and multiplicity of repercussions, not just medical, but also social (loss of loved ones, mourning, bereavement, isolation), economic (activity restrictions, sales...
Handling COVID 19: Minimizing our Blind Spots by Using Checklists and Promoting Collaborative Culture
“Blind spots” may refer to a topic, a theme or an area where we lack understanding, are unable to see it clearly, do not realize how critical this particular area is, or it represents an area where we fail to exercise j...
Reactive Lymphadenopathy: Triggering False Positives on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
There are numerous etiologies of reactive lymphadenopathy on radiological imaging. Lymph node evaluation is critical for screening high risk patients for new pathology, and for the planning of systemic chemotherapy and r...