Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2020, Vol 15, Issue 1

Abstract

Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of randomly assigned teams (a minimal group paradigm) among N = 4,846 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Using a set of Dynamic Identity Diffusion Index measures, we find that participants who give more in the Dictator Game show less preferential identification with their team relative to the other team, and more identification with all participants regardless of team. Furthermore, in an incentivized Voter Game, participants who give more in the Dictator Game are more likely to support compromise by voting for the opposing team in order to avoid deadlock. Together, these results suggest that – at least in this subject pool and using these measures – prosociality is better characterized by universalism than parochialism.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohsen Mosleh, Alexander J. Stewart, Joshua B. Plotkin and David G. Rand

Keywords

Related Articles

Bayesian and frequentist analysis of True and Error models

Birnbaum and Quispe-Torreblanca (2018) presented a frequentist analysis of a family of six True and Error (TE) models for the analysis of two choice problems presented twice to each participant. Lee (2018) performed a Ba...

Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention

Several decision-making models predict that it should be possible to affect real binary choices by manipulating the relative amount of visual attention that decision-makers pay to the two alternatives. We present the res...

Taking the sting out of choice: Diversification of investments

It is often the case that one can choose a mix of alternative options rather than have to select one option only. Such an opportunity to diversify may blunt the risk involved in all-or-none choice. Here we investigate re...

A proximity effect in adults’ contamination intuitions

Magical beliefs about contagion via contact (Rozin, Nemeroff, Wane, & Sherrod, 1989) may emerge when people overgeneralize real-world mechanisms of contamination beyond their appropriate boundaries (Lindeman & Aarnio, 20...

Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency

Recent research suggesting that people who maximize are less happy than those who satisfice has received considerable fanfare. The current study investigates whether this conclusion reflects the construct itself or rathe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678455
  • DOI -
  • Views 135
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohsen Mosleh, Alexander J. Stewart, Joshua B. Plotkin and David G. Rand (2020). Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678455