Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2020, Vol 15, Issue 1

Abstract

Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of randomly assigned teams (a minimal group paradigm) among N = 4,846 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Using a set of Dynamic Identity Diffusion Index measures, we find that participants who give more in the Dictator Game show less preferential identification with their team relative to the other team, and more identification with all participants regardless of team. Furthermore, in an incentivized Voter Game, participants who give more in the Dictator Game are more likely to support compromise by voting for the opposing team in order to avoid deadlock. Together, these results suggest that – at least in this subject pool and using these measures – prosociality is better characterized by universalism than parochialism.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohsen Mosleh, Alexander J. Stewart, Joshua B. Plotkin and David G. Rand

Keywords

Related Articles

On the meaning and measurement of maximization

Building on Herbert Simon’s critique of rational choice theory, Schwartz et al. (2002) proposed that when making choices, some individuals — maximizers — search extensively through many alternatives with the goal of maki...

High-stakes hedges are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference”

Frederick, Levis, Malliaris & Meyer (2018) report a package of laboratory studies where participants underestimate the value of “hedges”: Risky bets which cancel out the risk of another presently-held bet. However, it mi...

Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time

People frequently underestimate the time needed to complete tasks and we examined a strategy – known as backward planning – that may counteract this optimistic bias. Backward planning involves starting a plan at the end...

A model-based approach for the analysis of the calibration of probability judgments

The calibration of probability or confidence judgments concerns the association between the judgments and some estimate of the correct probabilities of events. Researchers rely on estimates using relative frequencies com...

The wisdom of crowds: Predicting a weather and climate-related event

Environmental uncertainty is at the core of much of human activity, ranging from daily decisions by individuals to long-term policy planning by governments. Yet, there is little quantitative evidence on the ability of no...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678455
  • DOI -
  • Views 155
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohsen Mosleh, Alexander J. Stewart, Joshua B. Plotkin and David G. Rand (2020). Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678455