Protecting the interests of the group (collective) in the jurisdiction of courts of common pleas and the Supreme Court in Poland

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2016, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

The Act of 17 December 2009 on pursuing claims in class actions regulating court proceedings in cases which involve claims of at least 10 people, is a kind of novelty in Polish law. Undoubtedly, it is a legal act improving and modernizing Polish civil proceedings. However, one should pay attention to new developments and the lack of their clarification, and therefore to the importance of already issued judgmentsof the Supreme Court. For this reason, existing jurisdiction on this subject has been presented and analyzed, which allows to precise the subjective scope, the term and extent of the unification of claims, as well as the concept and requirementof a representative of the collective. Without any doubts, the practice, which starts to shape, as indicated on the example of jurisdiction, will allow to clarify the scope of the subject and object of the Act. The ability to limit the claims for liability of the defendant has, without any doubts, a very important role in functioning of the class action, because the unification of pecuniary claims is in practice very difficult.Past court decisions show that unification should be understood as occurrence of a members’ request for the generically same forms of protection. Many practical problems are also raised by the concept of the representative of the collective, and the way, in which the collective should choose one.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Studzińska

Keywords

Related Articles

[b]Payment Services Market as an Entrepreneurship Development Tool – Legal Financial Aspects[/b]

One of the main elements that creates a single financial services market of the European Union is a retail financial services market. Its products are addressed to the average users of banking services, which include sma...

Criminal Liability for So-Called Cyber Rape on the Grounds of Article 191a of the Criminal Code

In the times of global ICT networks, activities pursued online are not limited by space and time, and the content shared in cyberspace may reach a potentially unlimited audience. Even if access to this content requires s...

[b]The Problem of Allowing for the Cost of Representation as a Legitimate Business Expense[/b]

In this article the author argues the case that businesses should have the right to include the cost of representation as an allowable and legitimate business expense. The cost of representation is, both necessary for th...

Leibniz i początki nowożytnego nacjonalizmu językowego

W artykule przedstawiam poglądy Leibniza w kontekście siedemnastowiecznej debaty na temat początków języka, inspirowanej jeśli nie czystym nacjonalizmem, to z pewnością poczuciem pierwszeństwa językowej i kulturowej trad...

Postulat jasności prawa. Plain language czy praca edukacyjna

W artykule podniesiono kilka aspektów jasności tekstów aktów prawnych w od- niesieniu do jej rozumienia przez różne podmioty (ekspertów i laików). Są to jednocześnie dwa różne punkty widzenia i dwie różne propozycje mają...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP210556
  • DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.125
  • Views 69
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joanna Studzińska (2016). Protecting the interests of the group (collective) in the jurisdiction of courts of common pleas and the Supreme Court in Poland. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 8(3), 162-186. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-210556