PROVOCATION OF THE FANTASY: MYSTIFICATED QUOTATION OF D. S. MEREZHKOVSKY AS A LITERARY FACT IN N. V. GOGOL STUDIES

Journal Title: Проблемы исторической поэтики - Year 2017, Vol 15, Issue 4

Abstract

At the beginning of the 20th century, half a century after the death of Gogol, in the periodicals of that time along with the memoirs of his last days of life appeared a story about how the writer’s spiritual father, archpriest Matthew Konstantinovsky, a famous preacher from Rzhev, supposedly asked the writer to “disavow Pushkin”. This theme immediately became one of the most urgent ones in the eyes of the writers of different directions. Thus, Gogol’s legacy once again turned out to be the center of ideological disputes and conflicts. Inspite of a rather stormy discussion of this issue at that time, the question of origins of the “spectacular” evidence of the irrepressible, “unreasonable” jealousy of the Rzhev pastor was left untouched. Accepted for granted, this testimony became later paradigmatic while covering the last days of Gogol’s life, inevitably reproaching Fr. Matthew (or, on the contrary, making an attempt to “justify” the priest). Meanwhile, a detailed study of this issue offered in this article shows that the author of the notorious phrase was not archpriest Matthew Konstantinovsky, but one of the key representatives of a new pre-revolutionary era D. S. Merezhkovsky. The mystified “evidence”, taken in 1902 by Merezhkovsky as a basis of his famous writing on Gogol, was initially promulgated by him at the first meeting of the Religious and Philosophical Assemblies, inaugurated in St. Petersburg on November 29, 1901.

Authors and Affiliations

Igor Vinogradov

Keywords

Related Articles

THE MOTIF OF THE SECOND COMING IN RUSSIAN FANTASTIC FICTION

The motif of the Second Coming of Christ takes a special place in Russian fantastic fiction at the turn of the millennium. In the recent decades allusions to the Gospel topic appears in increasing frequency in the genre...

LIST OF NAMES BY GOGOL: АВOUT THE FORM AND SEMANTICS OF PERSONAL NAMES IN HIS SHORT STORY COLLECTION “MIRGOROD”

The article presents the characteristics of personal names from four Gogol’s stories of the series “Mirgorod” (1835). It is based on the interpretation of common Slavic Christian names in their Ukrainian and Russian vers...

RESURRECTION MOTIF IN THE WORKS OF LEONID ANDREEV

This article is devoted to the problem of resurrection which was widely spread in Silver age philosophy and literature. Basing on the New Testament, Russian philosophers N. Fyodorov and V. Solovyov associated the resurre...

A COSMOPOLITAN OR A PATRIOT? THE CONCEPTION OF PATRIOTISM IN DISPUTES WITH GOGOL AND ABOUT GOGOL

The article puts a question of understanding of patriotism by Gogol and Belinsky. The problem is contemplated within the broad context of the interaction and opposition between Slavophilism and Westernism. The sources of...

MORE ON THE EVANGELICAL SENSE OF THE PARABLE “FISH SOUP” BY I. A. GONCHAROV

The article deals with the parable-short story of I. A. Goncharov “Fish Soup” (“Uha”), written presumably in July-August of 1891. It is aimed at altering the predominating opinion about the writer’s final literary work a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP301408
  • DOI 10.15393/j9.art.2017.4741
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Igor Vinogradov (2017). PROVOCATION OF THE FANTASY: MYSTIFICATED QUOTATION OF D. S. MEREZHKOVSKY AS A LITERARY FACT IN N. V. GOGOL STUDIES. Проблемы исторической поэтики, 15(4), 7-21. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-301408