Proximal Femoral Nailing Vs Dynamic Hip Screw For Intertrochanteric Fractures – A Comparative Clinical Study

Abstract

Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the common fractures encountered in today's orthopaedic practice. Over time, a number of implants have been used for the same. Multiple studies have been conducted in the past to study the advantages and disadvantages of the proximal femoral nail and the dynamic hip screw. However, the ideal choice of the implant remains a matter of debate. This study deals with the comparison of the Proximal femoral nailing (PFN) versus Dynamic hip screw (DHS) in treatment of Intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: This study was conducted from October 2015 to August 2017. During this period 30 cases of adult patients with intertrochanteric fractures of femur were selected according to the inclusion criteria and classified according to the AO classification. Of the 30 cases,16 were operated using a proximal femoral nail and 14 were operated using dynamic hip screw. Aims: To assess the functional outcome and radiological outcome in cases of Intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nailing and dynamic hip screw. And to study and compare the intra-operative parameters in both modes of treatment like duration, blood loss, radiological exposure. Methods and Material: A prospective study was conducted from 2015 to 2017 during which 30 cases of Intertrochanteric fractures that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were operated either using Proximal femoral nailing or dynamic hip screw. The choice of implant was chosen randomly. The AO/OTA classification system was used to classify the fractures.3 Conclusions: Our study shows that Proximal Femoral Nailingis a superior procedure in terms of lesser operative time, lesser blood loss, smaller incision, lesser post operative shortening but radiographic exposure is more compared to the Dynamic Hip Screw.Patient operated with PFN, being an intra-medullary implant, could fully weight bear without pain at significantly earlier as compared to those by DHS.However, long term results are equivalent for both. PFN is a more preferred implant for intertrochanteric fractures, especially for unstable pattern types. In cases of stable pattern fractures, PFN and DHS both have similar results.

Authors and Affiliations

Santosh Bindhumadhavan, Sudhir Sharan, Rajib Naskar, Harshad Argekar

Keywords

Related Articles

A Comparative Study On Management Of Colles’ Fracture By Closed Manipulation And Casting Versus Closed Manipulation, K-Wiring And Casting

Background: Colles’ fracture is one of the common injuriesin Orthopaedic practice. Since most of these are commonly managed by closed manipulation and casts, these invariably unite in malpositiondue to loss of reduction...

Clinical Evaluation Of Plantar Fascitis Treated With Prp Vs Corticosteroid Injection

Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common cause of heel pain. It is thought to result from chronic overload and is characterized by pain at the calcaneal origin of the plantar fascia, exacerbated by weight bearing af...

Assessment Of Outcome Of Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Various Surgical Modalities In Elderly

Displaced proximal humeral fractures when treated surgically produce less pain, less stiffness and greater ROM. Earlier the surgery better are the results. In severely comminuted fractures where anatomy cannot be restore...

Comparative Study Of Tourniquet V/S Tranexamic Acid Use On Blood Loss In Total Knee Arthroplasty

Context: Total knee replacement (TKR) is often carried out using a tourniquet to minimize intraoperative blood loss. However, its application enhances local fibrinolysis, resulting in excessive blood loss during the post...

Functional outcome of rotator cuff tears with conservative treatment – our study

Background In the era of modern advanced surgeries patients from low and middle socio economic status find it difficult to afford the cost of surgical treatment for rotator cuff tear. Hence it might be beneficial to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP394873
  • DOI -
  • Views 142
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Santosh Bindhumadhavan, Sudhir Sharan, Rajib Naskar, Harshad Argekar (2017). Proximal Femoral Nailing Vs Dynamic Hip Screw For Intertrochanteric Fractures – A Comparative Clinical Study. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 3(2), 622-628. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-394873