Prudential Versus Probative Arguments for Religious Faith: Descartes and Pascal on Reason and Faith

Journal Title: Religions - Year 2017, Vol 8, Issue 8

Abstract

In this article, I show that Pascal’s prudential agenda, centered on the Wager, more successfully overcomes the restrictions of Pyrrhonic skepticism expressed by Montaigne than Descartes’ probative philosophy, which was based on his “ontological argument” for God’s existence. Descartes’ attempt to base natural science on the metaphysical certainty of a non-deceiving God fails because he cannot prove that a non-deceiving Perfect Being is a “clear and distinct” idea. Pascal’s attempt to base the knowledge of God upon the “reasons of the heart” accepts the epistemological restrictions of skepticism but provides a reason to develop passionate faith, thereby overcoming skepticism. I also show that Descartes and Pascal had different assumptions about the workings of the mind; Descartes relied on a model of the mind as a “theater,” which hindered his agenda, and Pascal upon a “holistic” model, which enabled him to make a prudential argument which was cognitively convincing.

Authors and Affiliations

Dennis Sansom

Keywords

Related Articles

Globalization and Religion: The Case of Malacca and the Work of Robert Morrison

Religion has long been a significant factor in the process of globalization. In this article, the author attempts to explore and review religious factors involved in the history of Malacca (Melaka) and in the missionar...

The King Must Protect the Difference: The Juridical Foundations of Tantric Knowledge

Drawing upon inscriptional, art historical, as well as largely unstudied and unpublished textual evidence, this paper examines the conceptualization of religious diversity in the Medieval Deccan prior to the Islamic in...

Rethinking Amalek in This 21st Century

Twice in the Hebrew Bible—Exodus 17:14–16 and Deuteronomy 25: 17–19—the ancient Israelites were commanded to “blot out” the memory of Amalek, their enemy for all time (as God intended to do as well). Yet, because these...

Searching for the Hidden: A Phenomenological Study Exploring the Spiritual Aspects of Day Case Surgery from Staff Perspectives

Recent healthcare literature has shown an increasing interest in spiritual care and the way in which it supports patients as they deal with illness; but; as the body of evidence grows in many areas; the spiritual aspec...

“This Is Our Jerusalem”: Early American Evangelical Localizations of the Hebraic Republic

This paper examines how evangelical pastors applied Protestant notions of a Hebraic Republic for their parishioners as America transitioned from a colonial frontier to a new republic. As the American constitutions took...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP25731
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8080136
  • Views 326
  • Downloads 9

How To Cite

Dennis Sansom (2017). Prudential Versus Probative Arguments for Religious Faith: Descartes and Pascal on Reason and Faith. Religions, 8(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-25731