Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego oraz Trybunału Konstytucyjnego
Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2019, Vol 20, Issue 3
Abstract
The Polish Constitutional Tribunal issued an important decision regarding the exercise of the profession of an attorney-at-law, regarding the resolution of doubts as to the possibility of filing a complaint against the actions of the Disciplinary Proceedings Representative of the Bar Association of Attorneys-at-Law. In addition, the Tribunal ruled that the Article 138 of the Act of May 20, 1971 – Polish Code of Offenses, in the part containing the words “or intentionally refuses to perform the service to which they are obliged without a justified reason”, is not constitutional. Moreover, through a judgment of June 3, 2019, the Polish Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary complaint (to appeal a final decision of a common court or military court) of the Polish Public Prosecutor General, recognizing that damages agreements resulting from the court proceedings can determine attorney’s fees, relative to the amount awarded by the court to the plaintiff, i.e. the applicable success fee is allowed by the Polish law. The Supreme Court, composed of seven judges, also adopted a resolution in which it indicated that the buyer of a claim for compensation for motor accident is entitled to a reimbursement of justified costs of an expert’s opinion commissioned to a third party only if its creation was necessary in the circumstances of the case for the effective recovery of damages.
Authors and Affiliations
Kacper Mirosław Milkowski
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP640404
- DOI -
- Views 100
- Downloads 0
Milczące załatwienie sprawy w Kodeksie postępowania administracyjnego – rewolucja czy nie?
The article addresses the most important issues connected with the so-called tacit settlement of a case, introduced into the Administrative Procedure Code by the most recent amendment. Aside from generally characterizing...
Tryb autokontroli w postępowaniach prowadzonych na podstawie art. 36–36 (9) Ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
This article addresses the issue of the possible application of self-review with regard to decisions issued in the proceedings conducted pursuant to Article 36 et seq. of the Legal Adviser Act (the administration of the...
Odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna radców prawnych
The article presents the law governing the disciplinary responsibility of legal advisers. The discussion begins with an observation on the growing significance of disciplinary responsibility in the legal system and an at...
Dress code w miejscu pracy – wybrane zagadnienia
Labour law is a branch of law that regulates not only employment itself but also the associated social relations. The influences of such disciplines as sociology, psychology, and economics are easily noticeable. Nowadays...
Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 29 maja 2018 r. SDI 12/18 (LEX 2555740)
In the judgment of May 29, 2018 The Supreme Court decided that a negative prerequisite of removing a doctor from the list of members of the professional self-government of physicians and dentists occurs only at the momen...