PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES of SOCIO-POLITICAL CONFLICTS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONS

Abstract

Any of society as heterogeneous great number conflict after the nature, than more difficult social structure of society, than anymore in him freedom and pluralism, moreover differentiated statuses, roles, functions, and sometimes and mutually exclusive interests, values, and, thus, more potential sources and reasons for conflicts. Therefore of conflicts are similarly natural for any level of collective vital functions, as well as all other forms of her display. In any conflict a psychological constituent conducts, thus conflicts between individuals are mostly based on emotions and personal hostility, and intergroup conflicts are usually carried by faceless character, the flashes of the personal hostility are although possible. An arising up conflict process it is difficult to stop. It is explained by that he always has cumulative nature, id est, every aggressive action results in an action in reply, thus stronger, than primary. A socio-political conflict destroys social associations in the first turn, negatively influences on group unity and on subjects psychologically apt to дезадаптації, that is why this problem is not only sociological, political, but also mostly psychological both from the point of view of influence of socio-political conflict on personality and from position of necessity of adjustment measures in relation to his consequences. The of psychological constituent of socio — political conflict is densely related both to his structure and with those individual properties that activate during his origin and development — with an emotional sphere, aggressiveness, suggestibility, by an anxiety and others like that. Complication of of socio — political conflicts consists in the ambiguousness of their consequences, namely: integration of consequences strengthen bitterness, result in destruction and bloodshed, to the increase of internal tension, divert attention members of group from vital problems; and integration consequences determine an exit from difficult situations, result in the decision of problems, strengthen group solidarity, push slightly a group to understanding of interests and necessities of her members.

Authors and Affiliations

A. Sh. Koval

Keywords

Related Articles

WORKING OUT COLLECTIVE TRAUMA: ODESSA RESIDENTS’ REPRESENTATIONS A YEAR LATER THE TRAGEDY

The research deals with a problem of psychological content and structure of the Odessa residents’ ideas of their working out collective trauma caused by the tragic events of May 2, 2014. A theoretical basis of the resear...

PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF AUTHOR’S LIFE CHOICE IN YOUTH AGE

Psychological phenomenon of life choise provide human competence of their life circumstances’ management. Individual makes his life choise in difficult, recessionary circumstances. Such choice designates his further life...

SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MOVERS

The article is devoted to the empirical investigation of some features of the passionate personalities, in particular, their demographic and personal characteristics. The study was carried out on the example of the emplo...

PSYCHOSIMANTIC NATURELE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY MOTIVES IN MANAGER’S CONSCIOUSNESS

At the present stage of motivation psychology’s development, the problems of forming and controlling professional motivation take center stage. This article reviews motivational structure of professional consciousness, o...

THE PROBLEM OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL SUPPORT OF CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES

The article is devoted to the problem of psychological and pedagogical support of children with special educational needs, which is topical in special psychology and pedagogy. Considering the recent world trends related...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP362759
  • DOI -
  • Views 72
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. Sh. Koval (2016). PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES of SOCIO-POLITICAL CONFLICTS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONS. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Психологія, 21(2), 114-120. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-362759