Public policy for thee, but not for me: Varying the grammatical person of public policy justifications influences their support
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 5
Abstract
Past research has shown that people consistently believe that others are more easily manipulated by external influences than they themselves are—a phenomenon called the “third-person effect” (Davison, 1983). The present research investigates whether support for public policies aimed at changing behavior using incentives and other decision “nudges” is affected by this bias. Across two studies, we phrased justification for public policy initiatives using either the second- or third-person plural. In Study 1, we found that support for policies is higher when their justification points to people in general rather than the general “you”, and in Study 2 we found that this former phrasing also improves support compared to a no-justification control condition. Policy support is mediated by beliefs about the likelihood of success of the policies (as opposed to beliefs about the policies’ unintended consequences), and, in the second-person condition, is inversely related to a sense of personal agency. These effects suggest that the third-person effect holds true for nudge-type and incentive-based public policies, with implications for their popular support.
Authors and Affiliations
James F. M. Cornwell and David H. Krantz
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678140
- DOI -
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
This way, please: Uncovering the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making
The translation of choice attributes into more meaningful information (e.g., from kWh to costs) is a form of choice architecture that is thought to facilitate decision making by providing decision signposts that activate...
Incentives in religious performance: a stochastic dominance approach
Using a stochastic dominance approach in an international dataset of about 10,000 Catholic subjects, we show that incentives (based on absolute belief) play a crucial role in religious practice (church attendance and pra...
Political double standards in reliance on moral foundations
Prior research using the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) has established that political ideology is associated with self-reported reliance on specific moral foundations in moral judgments of acts. MFQ items do not...
Gambler’s fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns
The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand belief have been classified as two exemplars of human misperceptions of random sequential events. This article examines the times of pattern occurrences where a fair or biased coin...
“I am uncertain” vs “It is uncertain”. How linguistic markers of the uncertainty source affect uncertainty communication
Two psychological sources of uncertainty bear implications for judgment and decision-making: external uncertainty is seen as stemming from properties of the world, whereas internal uncertainty is seen as stemming from la...