Public policy for thee, but not for me: Varying the grammatical person of public policy justifications influences their support
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 5
Abstract
Past research has shown that people consistently believe that others are more easily manipulated by external influences than they themselves are—a phenomenon called the “third-person effect” (Davison, 1983). The present research investigates whether support for public policies aimed at changing behavior using incentives and other decision “nudges” is affected by this bias. Across two studies, we phrased justification for public policy initiatives using either the second- or third-person plural. In Study 1, we found that support for policies is higher when their justification points to people in general rather than the general “you”, and in Study 2 we found that this former phrasing also improves support compared to a no-justification control condition. Policy support is mediated by beliefs about the likelihood of success of the policies (as opposed to beliefs about the policies’ unintended consequences), and, in the second-person condition, is inversely related to a sense of personal agency. These effects suggest that the third-person effect holds true for nudge-type and incentive-based public policies, with implications for their popular support.
Authors and Affiliations
James F. M. Cornwell and David H. Krantz
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678140
- DOI -
- Views 110
- Downloads 0
Is loss-aversion magnitude-dependent? Measuring prospective affective judgments regarding gains and losses
Prospect Theory proposed that the (dis)utility of losses is always more than gains due to a phenomena called ‘loss-aversion’, a result obtained in multiple later studies over the years. However, some researchers found re...
Healthy choices in context: How contextual cues can influence the persuasiveness of framed health messages
Research has shown that framing messages in terms of benefits or detriments can have a substantial influence on intended behavior. For prevention behaviors, positively framed messages have been found to elicit stronger b...
Maximizing as a predictor of job satisfaction and performance: A tale of three scales
Research on individual differences in maximizing (versus satisficing) has recently proliferated in the Judgment and Decision Making literature, and high scores on this construct have been linked to lower life satisfactio...
Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
The emergence of a leading alternative during the course of a decision is known to bias the evaluation of new information in a manner that favors that alternative. We report 3 studies that address the sensitivity of pred...
Decision-making styles and depressive symptomatology: Development of the Decision Styles Questionnaire
Difficulty making decisions is one of the symptoms of the depressive illness. Previous research suggests that depressed individuals may make decisions that differ from those made by the non-depressed, and that they use s...