Qualitative Evaluation of ‘BIPP Dressing’ for Intraoral Mucosal Defect

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Various biologic and non biologic graft materials are considered in the past as Intraoral wound dressing material. While autografts have issues related to donor site morbidity, allografts like collagen have limited intraoral usage due to allergenicity and ease of adaptability to the mucosal defect. Bismuth sub-nitrate Iodoform Paraffin Paste (BIPP) dressing is prepared by impregnating sterile gauze with a paste containing one part bismuth sub-nitrate, two parts iodoform, one part sterile liquid paraffin by weight. BIPP is well known for its antiseptic and astringent properties, henceforth serves as a good wound dressing material preventing infection and wound contractures. Its use in intraoral mucosal defects though widely acknowledged has rarely been evaluated. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the qualitative properties of BIPPs as an intraoral wound dressing material. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 patients with oral precancerous lesions of the oral mucosa were included in this study. After excision of the oral lesions, BIPP pack was used to cover the defects that were too large to close primarily. Before use, sterile BIPP gauze was cut into a suitable shape of the defect and was placed directly on the wound and stabilised using vicryl sutures. The dressing was removed after two weeks of the operation. The effectiveness and usefulness of the BIPP dressing was evaluated by scoring the following parameters in the intraoperative and postoperative periods: operability, haemostatic status, pain relief, feeding situation, epithelialisation, scar contracture, and safety. Results: Out of the 10 patients, in six patients BIPP was used for the buccal mucosal defect, in two patients for labial mucosal defect and in one patient each for tongue and palatal defect. In all the patients the raw wound post resection were covered with BIPP pack and stabilised with vicryl sutures. Postoperatively there was no adverse event, there was no discomfort and all the patients tolerated the BIPP dressing. Conclusion: BIPP use in covering the defect, post soft tissue resection of the intraoral precancerous lesion has given a satisfactory result in the present study.

Authors and Affiliations

Arun Paul Charlu, Saurabh Kumar, Rabin Chacko

Keywords

Related Articles

Evaluation of Masood’s and Modified Masood’s Scoring Systems in the Cytological Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Lump Aspirates

Introduction: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) has a leading role in the assessment of breast lesions. Masood’s Scoring Index (MSI) and its modification (Modified Masood’s scoring index; MMSI) has been proposed to...

Investigating the Influence of Teachers' Characteristics on the Teacher-Student Relations from Students' Perspective at Ilam University of Medical Sciences

Introduction: Establishing an effective teacher-student relationship may affect the quality of learning. Such a complex human relationship may be influenced by various factors in addition to teacher and student. Aim: The...

Palmer Freckling as a New Clinical Marker: Clinico-epidemiological Study of 26 Cases of Neurofibromatosis Type-1

ABSTRACT Introduction: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF-1) is an autosomal dominant genodermatosis characterised by Café Au lait Macules (CALMs), multiple neurofibromas, iris Lisch nodules, axillary and inguinal freckling an...

A Curious Case of Pneumomediastinum caused after Diesel Aspiration

ABSTRACT Subcutaneous emphysema and Pneumomediastinum can occur as an uncommon complication of inhalation of irritant. It is a rare complication of hydrocarbon ingestion. There are many causative factors like oesophageal...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP524090
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2018/30867.11423
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Arun Paul Charlu, Saurabh Kumar, Rabin Chacko (2018). Qualitative Evaluation of ‘BIPP Dressing’ for Intraoral Mucosal Defect. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(4), 11-14. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-524090