Quality of life and burden of informal caregivers providing care for patients with low function agility in the home environment

Journal Title: Family Medicine & Primary Care Review - Year 2019, Vol 21, Issue 1

Abstract

Background. Providing care to patients with low function agility in the home environment becomes a burden and leads to the worsening of the informal caregiver’s quality of life. Objectives. Aim of the research was to assess the quality of life of informal caregivers in the context of their burden linked to the care provided to chronically ill patients with low function agility in the home environment. Material and methods. Research was conducted in five public healthcare facilities, from September 2016 until February 2017, and included 138 informal caregivers. The WHOQoL-AGE scale was used to assess caregivers’ quality of life, and the COPE Index was employed to assessed caregivers’ burden. Results. According to WHOQoL-AGE, the average value of caregivers’ quality of life was 70.14 points. Caregivers’ burden according to the COPE Index Negative Impact of Care subscale was: M = 11.80; Positive Value of Care subscale: M = 13.71; and in Quality of Support subscale: M = 12.46. Statistical importance was at p ≤ 0.01 for WHOQoL-AGE scale, and the burden according to the COPE Index. Conclusions. Informal caregivers’ quality of life according to the WHOQoL-AGE scale corresponds significantly with caregivers’ burden according to the COPE-Index, in all of the analysed domains. Along with the increase of the negative influence of the care, general quality of life with all its subscales, as well as satisfaction, decreases. Caregivers’ quality of life increases along with the increase of the satisfaction connected to the provided care, and with receiving support from informal and formal healthcare.

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Bartoszek, Edyta Gałęziowska, Barbara Ślusarska, Hanna Kachaniuk, Katarzyna Piasecka, Alina Deluga, Renata Domżał-Drzewiecka, Grzegorz Nowicki

Keywords

Related Articles

The effect of modern medical technology on the availability and cost of cataract treatment in older patients

country. Objectives. The aim of the study was to examine the availability of surgical cataract treatment among older Polish patients. Material and methods. Using data from 25,970 hospitalizations at the Ophthalmology War...

The effect of hypoxia on exercise tolerance in individuals after acute coronary syndrome treated with angioplasty combined with coronary stent implantation – pilot studies

Background. Currently, there is little documented research evaluating the effect of a high-mountain environment on patients with ischemic heart disease. Objectives. The main aim of the study was to assess the effect of n...

Oczekiwania rodzin pacjentów wentylowanych w warunkach domowych wobec opieki profesjonalnej

Wstęp. Leczenie w warunkach domowych pacjentów przewlekle chorych z Domowym Wspomaganiem Wentylacją (DWW ) powoduje, że na rodzinach spoczywa obowiązek, współodpowiedzialność za opiekę nad chorym. Osoby opiekujące się pa...

Jakość świadczonej opieki w ośrodkach całodobowego pobytu la osób w wieku podeszłym

Wstęp. Starzenie się społeczeństwa sprawiło, że większa liczba inwestorów zaczęła postrzegać domy opieki jako potencjalne źródło dochodu. Na rynku powstaje coraz więcej tego typu placówek, które funkcjonują często jako d...

Evaluation of the occurrence of anxiety in pregnant women with regard to environmental conditions

Background. A mother’s health, her family relations and social-economic conditions are factors which determine the course of pregnancy, childbirth and puerperal period. Objectives. The main aim of the study was analysis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP477720
  • DOI -
  • Views 42
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Agnieszka Bartoszek, Edyta Gałęziowska, Barbara Ślusarska, Hanna Kachaniuk, Katarzyna Piasecka, Alina Deluga, Renata Domżał-Drzewiecka, Grzegorz Nowicki (2019). Quality of life and burden of informal caregivers providing care for patients with low function agility in the home environment. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review, 21(1), 12-16. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-477720