Question about the Ethics of Yalta Agreements in 1945: Archaeology of Power in Historiographical Discourses
Journal Title: Conatus - Journal of Philosophy - Year 2019, Vol 4, Issue 1
Abstract
The Crimea (Yalta) Conference is by all means an extremely complex historical event. Any attempt to estimate its role and significance without analyzing its ethical components would unavoidably result in unduly simplifying the historical reality of the time, as well as in forming erroneous assumptions that would necessarily be used in the analysis of the causes of Cold War. A thorough examination will show that as far as the ‘ethical’ issues are concerned, there are significant developments with regard to general methodology, as well as its application to the sources. Generations of historians who have addressed the issue of Yalta Conference, although they have not been able to form a scientific, distinct ‘ethical’ tradition so far, have developed all the necessary prerequisites for its establishment. This is evident in the possibility of segmenting the issue in two parts on the one hand, and on the other in the availability of sufficient sources, structured databases, and selected outstanding works. Still, there are no studies about the Yalta Conference so far that address exclusively ethical issues concerning ‘good’ and ‘evil,’ ‘morality,’ ‘duty,’ and ‘honor.’ Although historiographical approaches are to a large extent dependent upon ethical viewpoints, in the case of Yalta agreements so far there have been no techniques available, so as to connect historical accounts with ideology, and historical facts with their philosophical background. In a sense, the situation is quite the same as it is with the study of prehistory: although there is an abundance of data and facts that can be primarily processed, there are no methodological guidelines, nor any devices to classify and explain them. This is also typical for any question raised about the ethics of the Yalta agreements in February 1945.
Authors and Affiliations
Oleg Konstantinovich Shevchenko
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP671767
- DOI 10.12681/cjp.18585
- Views 73
- Downloads 0
Bioethics and Reason in a Secular Society: Reclaiming Christian Bioethics
Bioethics evolved from traditional physician ethics and theological ethics. It has become important in contemporary discussions of Medicine and ethics. But in contemporary secular societies the foundations of bioethics a...
Ηθική Ενίσχυση, Ελευθερία και το Μηχάνημα του Θεού
Ένα από τα πλέον αναπτυσσόμενα επί μέρους πεδία των γνωσιακών επιστημών είναι η επιστήμη της ηθικής. Προηγμένες τεχνικές της νευροεπιστήμης, όπως η νευροαπεικόνιση, καθώς και περίπλοκες φαρμακολογικές, ψυχολογικές και οι...
Η διάκριση των αρετών και η αρετή της φιλίας κατά τον Αριστοτέλη
Ως αρετές ορίζονται, κατά τον Αριστοτέλη, εκείνες οι «ἕξεις» που είναι άξιες επαίνου: «τῶν ἕξεων δὲ τὰς ἐπαινετὰς ἀρετὰς λέγομεν». Διακρίνονται σε δυο κατηγορίες, στις διανοητικές και τις ηθικές. Η φιλία, κατά τον Σταγει...
Η έννοια του «έργου τέχνης» στον Arthur Danto: Συλλογιστική πορεία και μεθοδολογική προσέγγιση
Η πραγμάτευση της έννοιας «έργο τέχνης» στον Arthur Danto λαμβάνει χώρα κάτω από τη διττή οπτική της Τέχνης της ίδιας ως διαδικασίας παραγωγής και της Φιλοσοφίας–Θεωρίας της Τέχνης ως μέσου αξιολόγησης στη βάση του Ιστορ...
A. Renaut. Political Philosophy: Applied and Global
The following conversation with Alain Renaut, emeritus Professor of Political Philosophy and Ethics at the University of Paris-Sorbonne (Paris IV), and director of the International Centre for Applied Political Philosoph...