REASONS CONCERNING THE RESTRICTION OF SOME RIGHTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 53 OF CONSTITUTION

Abstract

An essential dimension of the lawful state is represented by the consecration and guaranteeing of the fundamental rights and liberties, the ensuring of the optimum conditions for their exercising. The state authorities have the negative obligation to restrain from any arbitrary or excessive requirement that may restrict or condition the exercise of the constitutional right. In order to be legitimate and constitutional, any restriction of the exercise of the fundamental rights and liberties through the measures prescribed by the state’s authorities, needs to have the character of exemption, not to affect the substance of the law and to fulfill all conditions stipulated by article 53 of Constitution. In relation to these premises we analyze in this study the constitutional institution of restraining some rights’ exercising and the relevant aspects of jurisprudence. The observance of the principle of proportionality is one of the constitutional requirements in order that such a restrictive measure be legitimate. The main particularities of the principle of proportionality applied in the matter of restraining some rights’ exercising are analyzed with reference to the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human’s Rights.

Authors and Affiliations

Marius ANDREESCU, Claudia ANDREESCU

Keywords

Related Articles

EU FACILITATES NEW RULES FOR CROSS-BORDER MOBILITY OF COMPANIES

Legal certainty is needed in the Company Law area, and this could be obtained if all the factors act jointly to achieve this aim by introducing division and conversion regulation, improving legal framework on mergers and...

IRAN AND INDIA BETWEEN REGIONAL GOVERNANCE AND GLOBAL CHALLENGES

In a intimately interdependent global environment where one’s prosperity depends on the contacts realised with others, isolating one government or community is not only improbable but dangerous because the respective gov...

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON PUBLIC DEBIT IN ROMANIA

This paper states that public debt can be defined as an amount that a country owes to creditors outside themselves, but also to individuals, businesses and even other governments. The term "public debt" is used interchan...

ACCOUNTING HARMONIZATION AND HISTORICAL COST ACCOUNTING

There is a huge interest in accounting harmonization and historical costs accounting, in what they offer us. In this article, different valuation models are discussed. Although one notices the movement from historical c...

OFFERING BRIBES: A LEGI-PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE

Offering a bribe is generally thought of as giving something of value with corrupt intent to influence an action of a civil servant in his official capacity. This act can be accomplished physically or verbally hiding beh...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP298134
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marius ANDREESCU, Claudia ANDREESCU (2017). REASONS CONCERNING THE RESTRICTION OF SOME RIGHTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 53 OF CONSTITUTION. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 9(11), 347-355. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-298134