Recovery Pattern of Vegetation during Succession Following Slash and Burn Agriculture in Mizoram, North-East India

Journal Title: Journal of Plant Biology & Soil Health - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

The recovery of forest after shifting cultivation (locally known as ‘jhum’) has multiple complications as observed in various forest types, disturbed regimes, climate conditions and so forth. Rate of recovery and species composition are of major concern to understand the process of succession. The present study was carried out in Champhai district of Mizoram, India with the aim to comprehend the recovery of vegetation at different stages of succession after abandonment. Jhum fields of 5, 10, 15 and 25 fallow ages were located from the satellite imagery and the plot was navigated using GPS. Quadrats were randomly laid within those plots and the plants were enumerated and analysed. The species were contiguously distributed. Ecological indices indicated high diversity and species richness for tree and shrub components but low diversity and species richness for herbaceous component. The number of tree species declined by 5.1% from 5 years fallow to 10 years fallow. However, it increases from 10 years to 15 years fallow by 8.1% and was further enhanced to 32.5% on 25 years fallow. It was also observed that the number of shrub species declined from 5 years to 10 years fallow by 4.9% which worsened to 15.4% on 15 years fallow. Nevertheless, there was a distinct rise in the number of species on the 25 years fallow by 54.6%. Interestingly, the number of herbaceous species was observed to decrease from 5 years to 10 years fallow by 6.8% and further declined by 2.4% and 17.5% on 15 years and 25 years fallow, respectively. Therefore, the percent recovery of tree and shrub species from 5 years to 25 years fallow was 35.9% and 24.4%, respectively, while 25.0% of herb species declined during the same fallow period.

Authors and Affiliations

Uttam Kumar Sahoo

Keywords

Related Articles

Yield Response of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to Combined Application of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers at Mechara, Eastern Ethiopia

A field experiment was conducted in 2012 cropping season to determine the optimum rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers for maximum yield of common bean and to select the best combination of varieties and fertiliz...

Identification of Characters Correlated with Tuber Yield in Guinea White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir)

A study was conducted in 2016 cropping season in two locations (Itu and Uyo) in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria to assess characters associated with fresh tuber yield in guinea white yam. The positive and highly significant cor...

Response of Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended NPS Fertilizer in Adola District, Southern Ethiopia

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Biofield Energy Healing Treatment on the plant callus of Mandukparni (Centella asiatica), Katsarika (Barleria cristata), and Amla (Phyllanthus emblica) in...

Feeding Potential and Prey Acceptance of Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): Implications for Biological Pest Control

Determination of feeding potential and prey acceptance of natural enemies is crucial to assure that natural enemies can control target pest species. This study was conducted to investigate feeding potential and prey acce...

Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) to Lime Application and Rhizobium Inoculation on Nitosols at Bench-Maji Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia

Haricot bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) is one of the most economically important legume crops cultivated in Ethiopia. However, its productivity has never reached its full potential of production that it has in supporting i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP205541
  • DOI 10.13188/2331-8996.1000012
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Uttam Kumar Sahoo (2016). Recovery Pattern of Vegetation during Succession Following Slash and Burn Agriculture in Mizoram, North-East India. Journal of Plant Biology & Soil Health, 3(2), 1-8. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-205541