Reducing the impact bias in judgments of post-decisional affect: Distraction or task interference.?

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

People overestimate their affective reactions to future events and decisions — a phenomenon that has been termed “impact bias.” Evidence suggests that completing a diary detailing events contemporaneous with the focal one de-biases judgments of affect. It is generally assumed that this is because diary completion helps people to realize that they will be distracted from the focal event. However, there is another possibility: de-biasing may occur because diary completion interferes with the processing responsible for the bias. In a first experiment, we showed that diary completion also lowers affect associated with past decisions. In a second experiment, we showed that solving anagrams has the same effect. A third experiment demonstrates that this is not because affect judgments are influenced by mood changes brought about by solving anagrams. Indeed, monitoring moods lowered affect in the same way as diary completion. It appears that cognitive tasks of any sort interfere with the processing required by judgments of affect.

Authors and Affiliations

Stephan Dickert and Paul Slovic

Keywords

Related Articles

The effects of anticipated regret on risk preferences of social and problem gamblers

Anticipated regret is an important determinant in risky decision making, however only a few studies have explored its role in problem gambling. This study tested for differences in the anticipation of regret among social...

Can asymmetric subjective opportunity cost effect explain impatience in intertemporal choice? A replication study

In “The value of nothing: asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making” Read, Olivola and Hardisty (2017) proposed an asymmetric subjective opportunity cost (ASOC) effect to explain and...

Searching for coherence in a correspondence world

In this paper, I trace the evolution of the aircraft cockpit as an example of the transformation of a probabilistic environment into an ecological hybrid, that is, an environment characterized by both probabilistic and d...

On the relative importance of the hot stove effect and the tendency to rely on small samples

Experiments have suggested that decisions from experience differ from decisions from description. In experience-based decisions, the decision makers often fail to maximise their payoffs. Previous authors have ascribed th...

The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment

The representativeness heuristic (RH) has been proposed to be at the root of several types of biases in judgment. In this project, we ask whether the RH is relevant in two kinds of choices in the context of gambling. Spe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677687
  • DOI -
  • Views 147
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Stephan Dickert and Paul Slovic (2009). Reducing the impact bias in judgments of post-decisional affect: Distraction or task interference.?. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677687