Relative thinking in consumer choice between differentiated goods and services and its implications for business strategy

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

The article shows that when people consider differentiated goods or services that differ in price and quality, they exhibit a decision-making bias of “relative thinking”: relative price differences affect them even when economic theory suggests that only absolute price differences matter. This result is obtained in four different consumption categories. Sometimes subjects are affected only by relative price differences (“full relative thinking”) and sometimes also by absolute price differences (“partial relative thinking”). This behavior has implications for various disciplines, and it is particularly relevant in models dealing with horizontal or vertical differentiation, optimal pricing, competitive strategy, or advertising.

Authors and Affiliations

Ofer H. Azar

Keywords

Related Articles

When is it appropriate to reprimand a norm violation? The roles of anger, behavioral consequences, violation severity, and social distance

Experiments on economic games typically fail to find positive reputational effects of using peer punishment of selfish behavior in social dilemmas. Theorists had expected positive reputational effects because of the pote...

Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale

The DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since 2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to summa...

“Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments

Recent research has shown that religious individuals are much more resistant to utilitarian modes of thinking than their less religious counterparts, but the reason for this is not clear. We propose that a meta-ethical b...

The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making

The aim of this article is to evaluate the contribution of process tracing data to the development and testing of models of judgment and decision making (JDM). We draw on our experience of editing the “Handbook of proces...

Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster

Environmental events such as natural disasters may influence the public's affective reactions and decisions. Shortly after the 2004 Tsunami disaster we assessed how affect elicited by thinking about this disaster influen...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677789
  • DOI -
  • Views 99
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ofer H. Azar (2011). Relative thinking in consumer choice between differentiated goods and services and its implications for business strategy. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677789