Relative thinking in consumer choice between differentiated goods and services and its implications for business strategy

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

The article shows that when people consider differentiated goods or services that differ in price and quality, they exhibit a decision-making bias of “relative thinking”: relative price differences affect them even when economic theory suggests that only absolute price differences matter. This result is obtained in four different consumption categories. Sometimes subjects are affected only by relative price differences (“full relative thinking”) and sometimes also by absolute price differences (“partial relative thinking”). This behavior has implications for various disciplines, and it is particularly relevant in models dealing with horizontal or vertical differentiation, optimal pricing, competitive strategy, or advertising.

Authors and Affiliations

Ofer H. Azar

Keywords

Related Articles

Coherence and correspondence in the psychological analysis of numerical predictions: How error-prone heuristics are replaced by ecologically valid heuristics

Numerical predictions are of central interest for both coherence-based approaches to judgment and decisions — the Heuristic and Biases (HB) program in particular — and to correspondence-based approaches — Social Judgment...

Think or blink — is the recognition heuristic an “intuitive” strategy?

Several approaches to judgment and decision making emphasize the effort-reducing properties of heuristics. One prominent example for effort-reduction is the recognition heuristic (RH) which proposes that judgments are ma...

Emerging sacred values: Iran’s nuclear program

Sacred values are different from secular values in that they are often associated with violations of the cost-benefit logic of rational choice models. Previous work on sacred values has been largely limited to religious...

“Leaving it to chance”—Passive risk taking in everyday life

While risk research focuses on actions that put people at risk, this paper introduces the concept of “passive risk”—risk brought on or magnified by inaction. We developed a scale measuring personal tendency for passive r...

Change and status quo in decisions with defaults: The effect of incidental emotions depends on the type of default

Affective states can change how people react to measures aimed at influencing their decisions such as providing a default option. Previous research has shown that when defaults maintain the status quo positive mood incre...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677789
  • DOI -
  • Views 129
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ofer H. Azar (2011). Relative thinking in consumer choice between differentiated goods and services and its implications for business strategy. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677789