Relative thinking in consumer choice between differentiated goods and services and its implications for business strategy
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 2
Abstract
The article shows that when people consider differentiated goods or services that differ in price and quality, they exhibit a decision-making bias of “relative thinking”: relative price differences affect them even when economic theory suggests that only absolute price differences matter. This result is obtained in four different consumption categories. Sometimes subjects are affected only by relative price differences (“full relative thinking”) and sometimes also by absolute price differences (“partial relative thinking”). This behavior has implications for various disciplines, and it is particularly relevant in models dealing with horizontal or vertical differentiation, optimal pricing, competitive strategy, or advertising.
Authors and Affiliations
Ofer H. Azar
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677789
- DOI -
- Views 121
- Downloads 0
Pair-wise comparisons of multiple models
Often research in judgment and decision making requires comparison of multiple competing models. Researchers invoke global measures such as the rate of correct predictions or the sum of squared (or absolute) deviations o...
Establishing the relevance of non-compensatory choice algorithms from stated choice surveys – an exploration
In applied sciences large-scale surveys are a popular means to acquire insights in the choices that people make in different contexts. In transportation research, for example, tens of thousands stated their choices betwe...
Decisions under unpredictable losses: An examination of the restated diversification principle
An experimental test of the descriptive adequacy of the restated diversification principle is presented. The principle postulates that risk-averse utility maximizers will pool risks for their mutual benefit, even if info...
Unconscious intuition or conscious analysis? Critical questions for the Deliberation-Without-Attention paradigm
The Deliberation without Attention (DWA) effect refers to apparent improvements in decision-making following a period of distraction. It has been presented as evidence for beneficial unconscious cognitive processes. We i...
Lay understanding of probability distributions
How accurate are laypeople’s intuitions about probability distributions of events? The economic and psychological literatures provide opposing answers. A classical economic view assumes that ordinary decision makers cons...