Religious Activity and Mechanisms of Personality’s Psychological Defense

Journal Title: Психологічні перспективи - Year 2017, Vol 1, Issue 30

Abstract

The article reveals theoretic analysis of the mechanisms of personality’s psychological defense in the context of their connection with the levels of religious activity. Contradictory empirical data of the researchers from several different countries have been taken into consideration. Results of author’s empirical research conducted on a representative sample of Ukrainians have been described and analyzed. The fundamental methods and techniques are «The measuring technique of religious activity» by D. O. Smirnov and the «Life Style Index» (R. Plutchik, H. Kellerman, J. Conte). Four subgroups of examinees have been singled out on the first stage: with the lowest level of religious activity (138), with a lower than average (141), with a higher than average level (139) and with the highest level of religious activity (125). Tension indicators of each mechanism of psychological defense in particular and the very tension of representatives of all four subgroups in general have been stated on the second stage. First of all, it has been established that Ukrainians are characterized by a rather high total indicator of the intensity of defense psychological mechanisms – an average of about 60 %. At the same time, regardless of the level of RA, the most influential are projection, the least influential are regression and substitution. Due to the results of the application of methods of mathematical and statistical processing of data (Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance) the following conclusions have been made: along with the growth of religious activity, the psychological mechanism of hypercompensation increases most substantially, then – the mechanisms of denial and rationalization. However, weakening of the action of compensation have also been observed. It is generally stated that at the higher levels of religious activity of the investigated Ukrainians the most influential are mainly constructive psychological mechanisms, and this completely resonates with the humanistic axiological potential of the Christian religion.

Authors and Affiliations

Natalia Savelyuk

Keywords

Related Articles

Organization of Activity as a Criterion for Classification of Volunteering

The interdependence of various aspects of the definition of volunteerism in their correlation with levels realization volunteer activity was considered in the article.The levels of activity realization have been brought...

Responsibility as a Representation of the Architecture of the Internal Individual World

The article presents a theoretical analysis of representation features of the internal world as a responsibility or irresponsibility of the individual. It has been revealed that in conditions of social instability, volat...

Fairytale Theraphy as a Method of Psychological Support of Families with a Problem Child

The article focuses on the system of psychological assistance of a family with a problem child. In terms of represented research important is analysis of using the fairy-tale therapy as a constituent of psychological sup...

Psychological Analysis of Experiencing Psychological Well-Being

The psychological analysis of the personal psychological well-being is presented in the article. The process of experiencing psychological well-being in the human consciousness and the dynamic process of creating an expe...

Personality Space of Contemporary Youth: Peculiarities of Adaptational, Motivational, Personality and Behavioral Tendencies

The article concretizes the author’s position of studying the structural and functional components of a personality space of contemporary youth in the context of their socialization. The central positions of under standi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP538441
  • DOI 10.29038/2227-1376-2017-30-184-198
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Natalia Savelyuk (2017). Religious Activity and Mechanisms of Personality’s Psychological Defense. Психологічні перспективи, 1(30), 184-198. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-538441