Remarks on the Dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2016, Vol 68, Issue

Abstract

Where a system of constitutional judicial review is in place, the concept of democracy is understood as rejecting claims about an unlimited will of the sovereign as the source of state authority, and confining democracy to such manifestations of the majority will which enjoy Constitutional legitimacy – meaning that they are in compliance with the version of a human rights culture that has been inscribed in the Constitution and which is embraced by Constitutional judges when delivering their adjudication. Following the recent parliamentary and presidential elections, the political significance of the Constitutional Tribunal has increased enormously. Only the Constitutional Tribunal is capable of preventing the centre of political power (which governs over the legislative and executive branches) from pursuing its plans. According to parliamentary majority in order to change Poland and fulfil commitments to the electorate, the ruling party had to see to it that the Tribunal’s make-up is pluralistic. Otherwise, all their efforts would be exposed to destruction by the Constitutional Tribunal. This way of thinking, though, implies that the Constitutional Tribunal can be changed in an ordinary law in such a way as to render it incapable of opposing the ruling majority. Regarding the ongoing Constitutional crisis over the Constitutional Tribunal, a scenario involving the observance of the basic law does not appear to be a likely one – unless such scenario leads to the expectation, however mistaken, that political gains can thus be scored and that the operation of the Constitutional Tribunal will no longer pose a threat to plans of the parliamentary majority.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Ryszard Piotrowski

Keywords

Related Articles

Whither Warsaw

Warszawa wydostała się spod nazistowskiej okupacji jako zniszczone miasto, a następnie przez cztery dekady była pod sowiecką okupacją. Ludzie, którzy przetrwali, odbudowali Stare Miasto. Warszawa szybko się rozwija i nad...

The Legal Status of the Energy Regulator in Ukraine in the Context of Recent Legislative Changes and European Integration

The energy sector is a strategic industry of each state. Energy industry is one of the most important regulated fields at the EU level and a crucial direction of cooperation between the EU and Ukraine. EU legislation, pr...

The Concept of a Special Criminal Law as a Weapon Against “Enemies” of the Society

In Günther Jakobs’ terminology the term “Feindstrafecht” (enemy criminal law) means a special criminal law designed to fight enemies of society. Unlike traditional criminal law, it is not aimed at regular citizens but at...

Laws Regarding Controversial Cultural Heritage in South Africa and the United States: Public Monuments and Street Names

Działania wymierzone w dziedzictwo kulturowe z zamiarem wsparcia nowych politycznych i społecznych celów w świecie antycznym i niestety obecnie było i jest powszechną praktyką reżimów autorytarnych. Faraonowie usuwali im...

Charakter prawny oraz natura uprawnienia do rekompensaty oraz wcześniejszych form rozliczeń za mienie zabużańskie

This article treats about legal nature of compensation right to which people evacuated from former territory of Poland after 2nd World War are entitled. By citing regulations defining forms of fulfilling repatriates clai...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP188522
  • DOI -
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryszard Piotrowski (2016). Remarks on the Dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland. Studia Iuridica, 68(), 279-292. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-188522