Removing samples taken illegally in the criminal trial

Journal Title: Manager Journal - Year 2009, Vol 10, Issue

Abstract

As far as evidence in a criminal trial is concerned, Criminal Act no. 281/2003 has brought about a new procedural sanction in Romanian criminal procedure, completing article 64 in the Code of Criminal Procedure by a second para-graph, namely the exclusionary rule. The case-law of the European Court in Strasbourg is not very clear when it comes to the admissibility of illegally seized evidence against the defendant. As opposed to that, American and British common law and, following these standards, most of the traditional legal systems on the continent, acknowledge the practical use of this procedural sanction, although it is set out differently and gene-rates somewhat different effects. The said sanction is applied according to the particulars of each case, in order to achieve a just balance between the right to punish, which belongs to the state and the right to fair trial, which belongs to the suspect or the accused. In Romanian law, the unsubstantial legal provisions and the sparse case-law give no obvious answer to a series of fundamental questions related to the functioning and effects of this legal instrument: its relation to nullity, the “fruits of the poisonous tree” effect, its practical use depending on the “causes “ of illegality, the trial stage when it may be used, the procedure that governs its application and the persons entitled to benefit from this right etc. Moreover, the New Code of Criminal Procedure, in spiţe of its more complex content, tends to complicate many of the problematic issues in the current criminal procedure

Authors and Affiliations

Dumitru Rădescu

Keywords

Related Articles

Conducting an information security audit

The rapid and dramatic advances in information technology (IT) in recent years have without question generated tremendous benefits. At the same time, information technology has created significant, nunprecedented risks t...

Institutional Communication and Organizational Culture In Romanian Public Administration. A Case Study.

The present study aims to emphasize the extent to which modern management principles are known and applied in the Romanian public institutions. We also aim to identify a system of values that set a pattern of the organiz...

The Power of Oratory in Modern Leadership

Today, more than ever before, modern leadership calls for a greater interest in message composing and conveying from the perspective of persuasive communication. High performance requires varied, extensively elaborated c...

The effects of foreign capital on the economical system

Foreign capital plays an important role in the importance of the economic growth. It has gained importance in the recent years because of the curios, pattern of global imbalances, whereby capital seems to be flowing “"up...

Leadership vs. Management From Competitive Intelligence Perspective

This paper brings into attention a less studies topic: the analysis and intelligence productionspecificity – as competitive intelligence process stage – given that the beneficiary is practicing classic management or lea...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP451691
  • DOI -
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dumitru Rădescu (2009). Removing samples taken illegally in the criminal trial. Manager Journal, 10(), 200-211. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-451691