Response time and decision making: An experimental study

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 5

Abstract

Response time is used here to interpret choice in decision problems. I first establish that there is a close connection between short response time and choices that are clearly a mistake. I then investigate whether a correlation also exists between response time and behavior that is inconsistent with some standard theories of decision making. The lack of such a correlation could be interpreted to imply that such behavior does not reflect a mistake. It is also shown that a typology of slow and fast responders may, in some cases, be more useful than the standard typologies.

Authors and Affiliations

Ariel Rubenstein

Keywords

Related Articles

The decision paradoxes motivating Prospect Theory: The prevalence of the paradoxes increases with numerical ability

Prospect Theory (PT: Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) of risky decision making is based on psychological phenomena (paradoxes) that motivate assumptions about how people react to gains and losses, and how they weight outcomes w...

“Isn’t everyone like me?”: On the presence of self-similarity in strategic interactions

We propose that in strategic interactions a player is influenced by self-similarity. Self-similarity means that a player who chooses some action X tends to believe, to a greater extent than a player who chooses a differe...

Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors

Often to the detriment of human decision making, people are prone to an impact bias when making affective forecasts, overestimating the emotional consequences of future events. The cognitive processes underlying the impa...

Fast Acceptance by Common Experience: FACE-recognition in Schelling’s model of neighborhood segregation

Schelling (1969, 1971a,b, 1978) observed that macro-level patterns do not necessarily reflect micro-level intentions, desires or goals. In his classic model on neighborhood segregation which initiated a large and influen...

Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take Fewer Risks than Men?

Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in va...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678090
  • DOI -
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ariel Rubenstein (2013). Response time and decision making: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678090