Responsibility for security during the invoice wars. The case of contractors: an outline

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2014, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

There are many theoretical and legal issues related to the operation of PMCs and their presence (location of their registered offices) in democratic states under the rule of law that remain unsolved in legal doctrine and practice. There are no clear rules at an international level that define the status of these agencies and the way in which they carry out their duties. There is also the problem of distinguishing between contractors and mercenaries. PMCs, like PSCs, are used by states in exchange for large government contracts in so-called “unwanted wars,” where it is cheaper to conduct operations without parliamentary oversight, media publicity, or social objections to sending military contingents abroad. Sometimes it is a question of providing discrete military aid to “friend countries”. PMCs are politically safer in such a situation. Not only states but also non-governmental organizations, private companies, rebel groups and declining dictators hire these private armies. The problem requires urgent multifaceted reflection leading to changes in legal doctrine and legislative action, both at the international level and in individual countries.

Authors and Affiliations

Jolanta Jabłońska-Bonca

Keywords

Related Articles

Władza a kultura II

Przedmiotem drugiej części artykułu (pierwsza część została opublikowana w numerze 1/2019 „Krytyki Prawa”) pozostaje analiza wpływu wzorców kultury, m. in. takich jak uczciwość, dialog społeczny, eliminacja przemocy, na...

[b][i]Towards the Privatization of Labour Market Services. Selected Legal Aspects[/i][/b]

Overcoming state monopoly within the area of counteracting unemployment is a long term process. The first step in this direction was the breaking of the monopoly of public employment services for job brokerage. The Act o...

Przywłaszczenie mienia w świetle małżeńskiej wspólności majątkowej

Dominujący pogląd zakłada, że możliwa jest odpowiedzialność karna osoby, która bez wiedzy współmałżonka zbywa rzecz ruchomą wchodzącą w skład małżeńskiej wspólności majątkowej. Pogląd ten jest nieprawidłowy. W rzeczywist...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP62522
  • DOI -
  • Views 80
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jolanta Jabłońska-Bonca (2014). Responsibility for security during the invoice wars. The case of contractors: an outline. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 6(1), 597-622. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-62522