Restytucja mienia objętego działaniem tzw. dekretu Bieruta z 26 października 1945 r. w świetle działań Komisji do spraw reprywatyzacji nieruchomości warszawskich
Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2018, Vol 16, Issue 3
Abstract
The nationalization process that took place in Poland was driven by the political ideals of communism and, in principle, did not include compensating former owners. The issue of reprivatization, understood as the return of seized property or payment of compensation, has yet to be solved. In order to restore the protection of the public interest by remedying the infringements of law committed while issuing decisions on the basis of the provisions of the Decree of 26 October 1945 on the Ownership and Usage of Real Estate within Limits of the Capital City of Warsaw (known as the Bierut Decree), the Specific Rules for Removing Legal Effects of Reprivatization Decisions Concerning Warsaw Real Estate Issued in Violation of Law Act of 9 March 2017 has been adopted. The immediate effectiveness of the orders issued by the Commission for Reprivatization of Warsaw Real Estate, which provides the basis for entries into section III of land and mortgage registers, and the final nature of the Commission’s decisions, which enables entries into section II of land and mortgage registers only seven days from their publishing on the website of the office supporting the Minister of Justice, violate the principle of reliance on public records in land and mortgage registers. Defining the Commission’s matters as urgent and precluding the possibility of reconciling the status of the entries disclosed in land and mortgage registers with the actual legal status in the course of a trial, as well as the exclusion of the application of various principles governing administrative proceedings, raise questions about the significance of the Commissions’ operations to real estate trade and the rights of its participants. Whether the Commission succeeds in overcoming the absence of systemic reprivatization regulations is an open question.
Authors and Affiliations
Mirosława Pytlewska-Smółka
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP594543
- DOI -
- Views 68
- Downloads 0
Dopuszczalność dochodzenia przez pracownika roszczeń uzupełniających w przypadku rozwiązania umowy o pracę
The subject of this article will be the issue of supplementary claims to which an employee is entitled in connection with the termination of employment. The provisions of the Polish Labor Code do not contain any regulati...
Obowiązki profesjonalnego pełnomocnika w świetle nowelizacji Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z dnia 10 lipca 2015 r.
On July 10, 2015, lawmakers passed the Act Amending the Civil Code, Civil Procedure Code, and Certain Other Acts, which went into effect on September 8, 2016. The above-mentioned amendment imposes new obligations on prof...
Wpływ ostatecznego stwierdzenia nieważności warunków zabudowy z powodu ich ustalenia z rażącym naruszeniem prawa na obowiązywanie decyzji o udzieleniu pozwolenia na budowę
The article, entitled “The impact of the definitive declaration of invalidity of the land development conditions due to their determination with a flagrant violation of law on the validity of the building permit decision...
Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego sygn. II PK 264/15
The gloss assesses a current judgment handed down by the Supreme Court regarding alternative claims of employees (Article 45 of the Labour Code) arising under the provisions of the Labour Code in the event of defective n...
O żądaniach alternatywnych pracownika z art. 45 Kodeksu pracy
This article assesses the provisions of the Labour Code, including case law, on alternative claims of employees (Article 45 of the Labour Code) arising thereunder in the event of defective notice or termination of employ...