Retrieval of Gallbladder through Subxiphoid V/S Supraumbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2018, Vol 17, Issue 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND Aim- Diseases of gallbladder have presented for a long time. Before era of laparoscopic open cholecystectomy was the procedure of choice but invention of laparoscopy made it the procedure of choice for elective cholecystectomy. The operation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still evolving with time and the size, number of ports is reducing day by day. This prospective, randomised pilot study was done to compare the extraction of gallbladder through epigastric/subxiphoid port v/s supraumbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of operative time, complications, extention of the incision, hospital stay, cosmesis, ease of use and acceptability by both the patient and surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were taken up for study. The patients were divided into two groups A and B, each consisting of 30 patients. In Group A gallbladder was extracted through epigastric port and in Group B gallbladder extracted via supraumbilical port. The findings of subgroups were compared and results was evaluated by using ‘p’ (determined by chi-square test) and ‘t’ (determined using degree of freedom and standard deviation) values. RESULTS Females were found to be more prone to cholelithiasis. The mean operative time in Group A was 33.3 mins. and in Group B was 33.1 mins. Both the groups were comparable in terms of intraoperative complications, technical ease and feasibility. Port site infection was seen in 2 patients. The port used for extraction was the one, which became the site of infection. Port site pain was found to be most commonly associated with the epigastric port irrespective of whether it was used for extraction of gallbladder or not. Port site hernia was seen in only one patient in supraumbilical port site, which was found to be non-significant statistically. CONCLUSION It was concluded that both ports are equally efficient in terms of gallbladder extraction without any major complications or the time taken but port site pain was found to be most commonly associated with the epigastric port irrespective of whether it was used for extraction of gallbladder or not. Thus, reducing the size of epigastric port to 5 mm may reduce the morbidity.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Mohammad equal Ahmad, dr apurva agarwal

Keywords

Related Articles

Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Without Suture without Glue

Purpose: Evaluation of the safety, efficacy and outcome of pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft without suture without glue in the management of primary pterygium. Settings :Deptt of Ophthalmology, Agartala Gov...

Echocardiographic Pattern of Rheumatic Heart Disease In Makurdi Nigeria.

Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major cause of acquired heart disease in children and adults in developing countries. Sub-Saharan Africa has been described as the major hotspot for acute rheumatic fev...

Study of Morphometric Analysis of Scapula and Scapular Indices in Tamil Nadu Population.[Original Article]

The scapula is a large , flat triangular bone which lies on the posterolateral aspect of the chest. From the evolutionary point of view, scapula has undergone modifications especially in its shape. Scapular index has bee...

Prevalence of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Carcinoma in University of Calabar Teaching Hospital using Immunohistochemistry as surrogates for Intrinsic DNA gene characteristics.

Background:Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that shows inter and intra-lesion variation. The classification into molecular subtypes has made chemotherapeutic management of breast cancer easier and patient-specifi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP380898
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1708043641.
  • Views 33
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Mohammad equal Ahmad, dr apurva agarwal (2018). Retrieval of Gallbladder through Subxiphoid V/S Supraumbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 17(8), 36-41. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-380898