REVIEW ON SPONSOR / APPLICANT MEETINGS WITH FDA: HIGHLIGHTS OF NEW GUIDANCE OVER EXISTING

Journal Title: International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

The United States Department of Health and Human Services has a federal agency called the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA). A pre-planned assembling of two or more people who have been together for the purpose of getting a common goal via verbal interaction is called a formal meeting. During development stage of any drug or biological products pharmaceutical companies face trouble for both scientific and regulatory point of view, here role of formal meetings comes. Formal meetings between sponsor or applicant and FDA are usually related to development and review of drug and biological products. Center for Drug evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) regulates the formal meetings. These meetings are applicable to Pre – Investigational New Drug Application, Pre – Biologics License Application, New Drug Application for drugs and biological products and not applicable to Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA), application of medical devices and submission of biosimilar biological products. Meetings between FDA and sponsor or applicant are for resolution of dispute, clinical holds discussion, Assessment of protocols of clinical trial, during clinical trials, in between clinical trials – at the phase 1 ending or at the phase 2 ending, to discuss development program. The FDA has classified these formal meetings in different types based on the nature of the request, the information in the meeting request and each meeting type is handled through different procedures. The principles of Good Meeting Management Practices (GMMPs) must be maintained. There are specific requirements and procedures to request, prepare, schedule, conduct and document formal meetings. As the guidance documents for meetings are revised by FDA, Change in procedure and requirements takes place. Any pharmaceutical company need to be in line with new guidance requirements to avoid rejection. Formal meetings between sponsor or applicant and FDA save time, cost and will increase the probability of product approval.

Authors and Affiliations

Kothari Charmy, Shah Kavina

Keywords

Related Articles

Informed Consent form in Clinical Trial

Informed consent form is a vital requirement for research study on the human participant. It is the consent which is given by the subject before participate in clinical trial. Informed consent mainly came in existence af...

A Comprehensive and Comparative study of qualification process for Drug Development tools in US, Europe, Japan and India

Drug Development Tools are methods, materials, or measures that have the potential to facilitate drug development. USFDA has specified three major drug development tools and has also given the guidelines recommending the...

CONDUCIVE ENVIROMENT FOR FOSTERING INDIA SPECIFIC INNOVATION: NEW MEDICAL DEVICE RULES 2017

The medical technology sector in India valued at approximately $ 10 billion in 2015 at end consumer prices and is growing at 10-12 percent annually. Currently, the Indian medical devices industry represents just over 2 p...

REGULATORY PERSPECTIVES OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS IN GHANA

Drug Registration is a procedure of expertise of pharmaceutical product quality, efficacy and safety by the Regulatory Authority. The emergence of various formats has enabled the manufacturers of the drug to easily gain...

A retrospective study of Warning Letters issued by US FDA over 2015-2017

This paper provides contemporary climate of warning letters issued by US FDA over 2015 to 2017. With 1300$ Billion Revenue in 2017 United States stands as World’s largest Pharmaceutical Market. Being the largest, diversi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP338086
  • DOI -
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kothari Charmy, Shah Kavina (2016). REVIEW ON SPONSOR / APPLICANT MEETINGS WITH FDA: HIGHLIGHTS OF NEW GUIDANCE OVER EXISTING. International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs, 4(2), 19-26. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-338086