RISK OF MALIGNANCY INDEX IN PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF ADNEXAL MASSES

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 50

Abstract

BACKGROUND Ovarian tumour usually presents as adnexal mass but often it is difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant tumour. Several diagnostic modalities such as sonography and tumour markers have been evaluated in the past, but none have been established as an ultimate diagnostic tool individually. The development of a mathematical formula using a logistic model, incorporating menopausal status, the serum level of a glycoprotein called CA-125 and USG score has been described in the form of different malignancy indices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the various risks of malignancy indices (RMI 4) in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses, especially to differentiate between benign and malignant masses. Another objective of the present study is statistical analysis of parameters like specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prospective observational study of patients with adnexal masses detected during ultrasonography, who were scheduled for surgical exploration of adnexal mass and histopathological diagnosis, were included in the study. Histopathological examination was taken as gold standard to calculate the accuracy of RMI. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value and negative predictive value of all the four RMI were calculated and data analysed. A total of 100 patients were included in the study over a period of 2 years. RESULTS Sensitivity of RMI-4 was 91.2%. Specificity of RMI was calculated to be 98.7%. Positive and negative predictive values of RMI were 98.1%, and 93.7%, respectively with ROC of 0.95. The best cut off value of RMI is 300. CONCLUSION Risk of Malignancy Index is a good diagnostic tool to differentiate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.

Authors and Affiliations

Augusti Mary Priyanka, Shubhada Suhas Jajoo

Keywords

Related Articles

 INCIDENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS AND THEIR RESTORATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 Radiographs are an irreplaceable diagnostic tool, especially in dealing with dentofacial hard tissues. Guidelines like the ALARA require professionals to limit the number of radiographs prescribed to patient, t...

INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION DUE TO A FORGOTTEN MISSING LIPPES LOOP- A CASE REPORT WITH REVIEW OF LITERATURE

PRESENTATION OF CASE A 45-year-old female patient presented with intermittent pain in abdomen and recurrent episodes of vomiting since 6 months. She also reported intermittent constipation. On examination, patient had ta...

  MALE PARTICIPATION IN MATERNAL AND NEWBORN CARE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY FROM URBAN TAMIL NADU, INDIA

[b]  BACKGROUND[/b]: Male participation in maternal and newborn care has gained importance over the last two decades. Despite the fact that men being the decision makers and could contribute a lot towards safe mothe...

 ACANTHOMATOUS AMELOBLASTOMA- A CASE REPORT

 Ameloblastoma is the most common clinically significant odontogenic tumor of the gnathic arches. The majority of ameloblastoma occurs in the posterior mandible with a wide variety of radiological and clinical p...

MANAGEMENT OF DUPUYTREN’S DISEASE- OUR EXPERIENCE IN A TERTIARY CARE INSTITUTE

BACKGROUND Dupuytren’s disease is a benign fibroproliferative disorder that causes the fingers to be drawn into the palm by formation of new tissue under the glabrous skin of the hand. This disorder causes functional lim...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP549292
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2018/1185
  • Views 62
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Augusti Mary Priyanka, Shubhada Suhas Jajoo (2018). RISK OF MALIGNANCY INDEX IN PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF ADNEXAL MASSES. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(50), 5352-5357. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-549292