Rozwiązanie legislatywy w systemie parlamentarnym

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2017, Vol 139, Issue 2

Abstract

It is noticeable that, while the parliament has a lot of constitutional checks against the government, the latter does not, at least directly, have such a weapon. It must avail itself of good will of the head of state and his willingness to cooperate. Two constitutional checks are in play: the dissolution of the legislature and the vetoing of the statute passed by it. The first is considered a counterbalance to the procedure for exercising parliamentary responsibility by way of a motion of no confi dence. It has inhibiting effect on the legislature reducing their desire to apply this measure. Obviously, as a rule, its application leads to the immediate termination of the legislature’s mandate and necessitates the holding of a new election. It is, therefore, a measure to exert pressure on the parliament, used as a form of psychological blackmail. No MP will willingly resign from seat, especially in the face of an expensive, costly and cumbersome election campaign whose outcome is uncertain. In theory, the threat of dissolution of the legislature alone had to ensure a balance between it and the executive branch. Normally, use of this threat is enough to prevent the government from falling, because its parliamentary faction then closes ranks and ceases a revolt against its leadership. And when the threat does not work, it usually is put into effect. This measure is intended to be used as a means of resolving a fundamental conflict between the supreme state authorities, the confl ict which has damaged their ability to cooperate. The examined instrument is sui generis a counterpoint to the vote of no confidence, or a “deterrence.” Thus, it signifi cantly affects the functioning of the entire state system.

Authors and Affiliations

Ryszard M. Małajny

Keywords

Related Articles

Uprawnienia organów władzy wykonawczej w zakresie zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa państwa

State security and related issues are becoming increasingly important in the modern world. In this case, an interesting issue is to analyze it from the perspective of Constitution of Poland of 2 April 1997. The powers of...

Nadmiarowość językowa w Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku

In the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, redundancies take on various forms, which is particularly interesting for legal theorists. Language redundancy referred to in this article is also manifested in several ways...

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego Stanow Zjednoczonych z dnia 4 czerwca 2018 r. w sprawie Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

The discussed judgment refers to the problem of law prohibiting the discrimination in access to goods and services. Colorado Rights Commission, and then the Colorado Court of Appeal decided that the bakery owner Jack Phi...

Konstytucja RP z 1997 roku w procesie konsolidacji demokracji

The constitution is a basic element of the modern democracy. It sets the framework in which political life is conducted, and also contains a catalogue of incentives conducive to creating a democratic political culture. T...

Reorganizacja parlamentaryzmu greckiego po 1911 roku

Greece’s defeat in the war with Turkey in 1897 resulted in submitting the state’s finances to the control by an international committee and provoked the necessity to introduce systemic reforms. The role of the father of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP242057
  • DOI -
  • Views 40
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryszard M. Małajny (2017). Rozwiązanie legislatywy w systemie parlamentarnym. PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 139(2), 27-50. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-242057