RULE OF REASON AND PER SE ILLEGAL APPROACHES IN ENFORCING THE BUSINESS COMPETITION LAW
Journal Title: YUSTISIA JURNAL HUKUM - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 3
Abstract
This article aimed to find out and to give solution to the application of rule of reason and per se illegal approaches in solving the case of monopoly infringement and unfair business competition. This study was a doctrinal research with evaluative research form. The analysis used was deductive logic one. Per se illegal approach used by KPPU in making decision was based on deliberation and focused more on business behavior than on market situation. This rule of reason approach was an approach constructed based on an assumption that the high sale concentration in the presence of certain agreement between some business performers tend to result in substantial economic efficiency. Essentially, this rule of reason approach considered its economic benefit more than imposed restriction (prohibition). Standard rule of reason allows for the consideration of competitive factors and the determination of the feasibility of trading constraint. The recommendation of research was that: The use per se illegal and/or rule of reason in KPPU’s verdict should build on the objective of the development of Law No.5 of 1999, particularly the provision of Article 3, thereby can realize conducive business climate in the certainty of equal business opportunity for large, medium, and small scale employers, and the achievement of effective and efficient business activity. The application of per se illegal or rule of reason approaches in KPPU’s verdict was possible through the use of two approaches all at once, recalling very extreme difference of per se illegal and the rule of reason, and furthermore, most KPPU’s decision put its position between the two perspectives.
Authors and Affiliations
Sufmi Dasco Ahmad
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP336674
- DOI 10.20961/yustisia.v6i3.15020
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
KEdAULATAN SUMBER dAYA ALAM dI INdONESIA SEBAGAI AKTUALISASI NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA
Exploitation of natural resources which is the utilization of natural resources unwisely led to the decline of natural resources both quantity and quality and will eventually run out. consistency, relevance, and contextu...
UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG NO 37 TH 2004 MENGESAMPINGKAN BERLAKUNYA ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN
This study was to formulate a concept of return policies / principles of the law of "pacta sunt servanda" in Law No. 37 Year 2004 regarding Bankruptcy in bankruptcy to resolve disputes arbitration clause. By promoting le...
ASEAN WAY DALAM PERPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
ASEAN is not free from conflict among its members. For the example is Conflict between gunmen called themselves as representative of Sulu Kingdom with Malaysian policeman, conflict territory surrounding preh vihear templ...
NASIONALISASI PERUSAHAAN-PERUSAHAAN MILIK BELANDA ATAS TANAH KONSESI KESULTANAN DELI (Studi Awal Hilangnya Hak-hak atas Sumber Daya Alam Masyarakat Adat)
The nationalization of Netherland plantation which became the national possession in 1958, regulated in the Act No. 86 of 1958 was the starting point of the loss of natural resource rights of the Malay indigenous people...
COMPARATION OF WAREHOUSE RECEIPT, PAWN AND FIDUCIARY IN THE SECURITY LAW PERSPECTIVE
Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) has been used in Indonesia as an instruments of trade and finance to agribusiness commodities since the enactment of Law UU 9/2006 and PBI 9/2007. Bank Indonesia Regulation No 9 of 2007, Ar...