RULINGS OF THE NATIONAL COURTS FOLLOWING THE CURIA DECISION IN CASE C-186/16, ANDRICIUC AND OTHERS VS BANCA ROMANEASCA

Abstract

The CJEU's judgment in Andriciuc and Others vs Banca Românească Case C-186/16 that came in September 2017 is an addition to a growing body of case law on procedural obstacles to consumer protection under Directive 93/13/EEC. According to the Court, a contractual term must be drafted in plain intelligible language, the information obligations should be performed by the bank in a manner to make the well-informed and reasonably observant and circumspect consumer aware of both possibility of a rise or fall in the value of the foreign currency and also enabling estimation of the significant economic consequences of repayment of the loan in the same currency as the currency in which the loan was taken out. Following a succession of consumer-friendly preliminary rulings from European Court of Justice (Case C 26/13, Árpád Kásler, Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt and Case C-186/16 Andriciuc and Others v Banca Românească, bank customers across the European Union are increasingly taking their banks to court. However, there are still a lot provisions in the national legislations which made the judicial review of unfair contract terms difficult and reveals the limits of consumer protection under Directive 93/13. Also, we focus on the powers of the national court when dealing with a term considered to be unfair (civil) courts and the availability of legal remedies in ensuring the effectiveness of the Directive. Although the CJEU provides interpretation of EU law, the national court alone has jurisdiction to find and assess the facts in the case before it and to interpret and apply national law. The ruling issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJUE) in the Andriciuc versus Banca Românească case represents a great advantage for some of the European debtors. In this paper, we intend to examine, starting from the theory of abusive clauses and referring to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice in the matter, to what extent it is possible that under Council Directive 93/13 / EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the national laws of the various Member States to order "freeze of the exchange rate" or conversion of the currency of the credit into domestic currency

Authors and Affiliations

Monica CALU, Costel STANCIU

Keywords

Related Articles

ABOUT THE UNIONS OF THE STATE

The report examines the current problems related to the mechanisms of the country's accession to different types of alliances. Analyzing the processes and mechanisms for decision-making at the state level, are made the l...

EXTERNAL TRADE OF ROMANIA – TEN YEARS AFTER EU ACCESION (2007-2016)

Advantages of the EU single market and the costs related to adaptation the Community context and requirements, the impact of the international economic and financial crisis and the difficulties in accessing EU Structural...

PRACTICAL METHODS OF SELECTION AND CALCULATION OF SAMPLE SIZE FOR AUDIT SAMPLING

Audit sampling is very important part of audit works. No mater it is financial audit, internal audit and others kind of audit, audit sampling still need to be used by auditors. Sampling is a process of selecting a subset...

SOME ISSUES CONCERNING JURISDICTION ON CLAIMS FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF FOR INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

The article deals with some issues surrounding the assertion of jurisdiction on claims for preliminary or provisional relief for infringement of intellectual property rights in Romania. Starting with the sources of the n...

THE JUDGMENT IN LIEU OF THE CONTRACT - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF ARTICLES 1279 AND 1669 OF THE CIVIL CODE RELATING TO THE PROMISE OF SALE

The matter of enforcement in the promise of sale poses practical problems arising from the interpretation of the articles 1279 and 1669 of the Civil Code and that we intend to analyze in this study. Among the issues to a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP301890
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Monica CALU, Costel STANCIU (2018). RULINGS OF THE NATIONAL COURTS FOLLOWING THE CURIA DECISION IN CASE C-186/16, ANDRICIUC AND OTHERS VS BANCA ROMANEASCA. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 209-212. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-301890