Safety and efficacy of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large impacted Proximal Ureteral Stones

Journal Title: Journal of Surgery and Surgical Research - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

The management of large, impacted upper ureteric calculi remains challenging for urologists. Various treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), laparoscopic and open ureterolithotomy. ESWL has poor overall success rate in the treatment of large stones with a significant possibility of residual fragments. Semi-rigid or flexible ureterorenoscopy with Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy (URSL) has a stone-free rate of 89-100% in managing proximal ureteral calculi [1-7]. However, large and impacted proximal ureteral stones are difficult to approach. PCNL was introduced as an alternative treatment for large renal and proximal ureteric stones and achieved success in the 1980s [8]. The modified version of PCNL using a miniature endoscope by way of a small access tract, can be routinely performed to manage stones in the kidney and proximal ureter [9]. PCNL has been widely accepted as the treatment of choice for renal stones since the 1980s and is shown to have a higher success rate compared to other minimally invasive procedures, thus became the gold standard treatment for complex and large renal stones. However, bleeding and fever are the common complications. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy [10,11], is associated with a shorter period of convalescence when compared to an open procedure, but is associated with a higher learning curve. Open ureterolithotomy is indicated for failure of all minimally invasive modalities, in presence of a concomitant open procedure, and the presence of large impacted stone where patients don't consent for multiple procedures [12]. So, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mini-PCNL in impacted proximal ureteral calculi, we started this hospital based study (2014-2018) to use mini-PCNL (14F semi-rigid nephroscope via a 16-Fr percutaneous tract) for the treatment of large (≥15mm) impacted proximal ureteral calculi (from PUJ to lower border of L4 vertebra).

Authors and Affiliations

FA Najar

Keywords

Related Articles

Safety and efficacy of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large impacted Proximal Ureteral Stones

The management of large, impacted upper ureteric calculi remains challenging for urologists. Various treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutane...

Muscle-Sparing Thoracotomy: A Systematic Literature Review and the “AVE” Classification

Background: To synthesize the concept of muscle-sparing thoracotomies for major pulmonary resections and to explore the relationship between Kraissl’s lines and skin incisions perpendicular to them. Methods: Systematic l...

Preoperative Prediction of the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Introduction: Preoperative complexity estimation helps deciding whether to proceed with a minimally invasive approach, perform an open procedure or make a referral to a more experienced surgeon. Laparoscopic cholecystect...

Which Surgery in Geriatric Breast Cancer

Introduction: The improved living and environmental conditions have resulted in an increase in life expectancy with greater observation of breast cancer in elderly. The present study, through a retrospective analysis of...

Severe Vascular Complications Due to Liver Hydatid Cyst Relapse: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Vascular complications of liver hydatidosis are infrequent but severe. We present a case with severe vascular problems due to a recurrence of a liver hydatid cyst. A 39 year-old male consulted the Emergency Department af...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP532379
  • DOI 10.17352/2455-2968.000053
  • Views 52
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

FA Najar (2018). Safety and efficacy of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large impacted Proximal Ureteral Stones. Journal of Surgery and Surgical Research, 4(2), 15-18. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-532379