Savings, subgoals, and reference points

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

Decision makers often save money for a specific goal by forgoing discretionary consumption and instead putting the money toward the savings goal. We hypothesized that reference points can be exploited to enhance this type of saving. In two hypothetical scenario studies, subjects made judgments of their likelihood to forgo a small expenditure in order to put the money toward the savings goal. In Experiment 1, judgments were higher if the savings goal was presented as composed of weekly subgoals (e.g., save $60 per week to buy a $180 iPod). Experiment 2 replicated this finding and demonstrated that the subgoal manipulation increased judgments of likelihood to save money only when the money saved from the foregone consumption would allow the decision maker to meet the weekly subgoal exactly (not under or overshoot it). These results suggest a reference point mechanism and point to ways that behavioral decision research can be harnessed to improve economic behaviors.

Authors and Affiliations

Helen Colby and Gretchen B. Chapman

Keywords

Related Articles

Affective reactions and context-dependent processing of negations

Three experiments demonstrate how the processing of negations is contingent on the evaluation context in which the negative information is presented. In addition, the strategy used to process the negations induced differ...

Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making

We claim that understanding human decisions requires that both automatic and deliberate processes be considered. First, we sketch the qualitative differences between two hypothetical processing systems, an automatic and...

Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving

Some people find it more difficult to delay rewards than others. In three experiments, we tested a “future self-continuity” hypothesis that individual differences in the perception of one’s present self as continuous wit...

Measurement is the core disgust problem: Response to Inbar and Scott (2018)

Scott, Inbar and Rozin (2016) presented evidence that trait disgust predicts opposition to genetically modified food (GMF). Royzman, Cusimano, and Leeman (2017) argued that these authors did not appropriately measure tra...

Disentangling the effects of alternation rate and maximum run length on judgments of randomness

Binary sequences are characterized by various features. Two of these characteristics—alternation rate and run length—have repeatedly been shown to influence judgments of randomness. The two characteristics, however, have...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678038
  • DOI -
  • Views 114
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Helen Colby and Gretchen B. Chapman (2013). Savings, subgoals, and reference points. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678038