Science on Trial: Exploring the Rationality of Methodological Naturalism
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2014, Vol 11, Issue 0
Abstract
In this essay, I closely scrutinize the proposal presented in a recently edited volume entitled [b]The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence of an Intelligent Designer [/b]by J.P. Moreland. Moreland chides Christians for what he takes as their failure to understand the proper integration of their faith with secular disciplines, particularly the natural sciences. Contributors to this volume propose a „theistic science” which focuses primarily on the tactical or strategic proscription against direct reference to divine agency (methodological naturalism). These authors endorse the inclusivity principle, that is, the claim that explanations in terms of the direct and immediate activity of a divine agent may constitute a proper part of natural science. As I see it, the recommendation takes two forms: (1) it is positively irrational for the Christian engaged in natural science to remain committed to methodological naturalism, and (2) because science has no intrinsic individuating features, it is irrational for the broader scientific community to continue to resist appeal to immediate divine agency as a proper part of natural science. Specifically, I argue that the first statement is mistaken, and the second is ill-advised. The disciplinary distinction, as determined in part by methodological naturalism, is well-grounded, intrinsically valuable, and, when properly understood, a critical component of Christian inquiry. I conclude that permitting direct reference to divine agency in natural science severely undermines the overall quest for truth.
Authors and Affiliations
Robert O'Connor
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP142916
- DOI -
- Views 89
- Downloads 0
Explanatory Weaknesses of Intelligent Design
Instead of arguing against the content of ID, the paper points at its methodological deficiencies. In the first place, it is argued, against its followers, that ID is not falsifiable. Contrary to Evolution, ID cannot eve...
Finding Design in Nature
The aim of this paper is to dispel doubts that has grown around the pope John Paul II’s statement in which he allegedly proclaimed his view that the Catholic Church has accepted Darwinian theory of evolution. Cardinal Sc...
Understanding the Self Biologically
In Total Recall the hero discovers that his good-guy self is just implanted memories. His body used to be occupied by another, vicious self, whose allies want back. This fantasy gains some plausibility from the tradition...
Darwin i naturalizm
Darwinowską teorię ewolucji zwykle postrzega się jako zgodną z wymogami naturalizmu metodologicznego, jak jednak można pogodzić to z faktem, że w O powstawaniu gatunków Darwin wielokrotnie mówił o Bogu? Odpowiedź na to p...
How Not to Detect Design – Critical Notice: William A. Dembski, [i]The Design Inference[/i]
The article is a critical analysis of the explanatory filter concept presented by William Dembski in his book [i]The Design Inference[/i]. The filter is understood as formalization of the procedure leading to detection w...