Science on Trial: Exploring the Rationality of Methodological Naturalism
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2014, Vol 11, Issue 0
Abstract
In this essay, I closely scrutinize the proposal presented in a recently edited volume entitled [b]The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence of an Intelligent Designer [/b]by J.P. Moreland. Moreland chides Christians for what he takes as their failure to understand the proper integration of their faith with secular disciplines, particularly the natural sciences. Contributors to this volume propose a „theistic science” which focuses primarily on the tactical or strategic proscription against direct reference to divine agency (methodological naturalism). These authors endorse the inclusivity principle, that is, the claim that explanations in terms of the direct and immediate activity of a divine agent may constitute a proper part of natural science. As I see it, the recommendation takes two forms: (1) it is positively irrational for the Christian engaged in natural science to remain committed to methodological naturalism, and (2) because science has no intrinsic individuating features, it is irrational for the broader scientific community to continue to resist appeal to immediate divine agency as a proper part of natural science. Specifically, I argue that the first statement is mistaken, and the second is ill-advised. The disciplinary distinction, as determined in part by methodological naturalism, is well-grounded, intrinsically valuable, and, when properly understood, a critical component of Christian inquiry. I conclude that permitting direct reference to divine agency in natural science severely undermines the overall quest for truth.
Authors and Affiliations
Robert O'Connor
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP142916
- DOI -
- Views 100
- Downloads 0
Proliferation as a Factor Maintaining Human Evolution in the Light of Paul K. Feyerabend’s Early Philosophy
In his early philosophy, Feyerabend claimed that the interaction between the principles of proliferation and tenacity may increase the tendency towards useful biological mutations. He also maintained that the interplay b...
A więc sądzisz, że jesteś darwinistą?
Myślę, że w dzisiejszych czasach większość ludzi wykształconych uważa się za darwinistów. Jeśli tak jest w istocie, dzieje się to za sprawą niedostatecznej wiedzy na temat darwinizmu i tego, o czym on mówi. Mówi on bowie...
Darwin’s Greatest Discovery: Design without Designer
Darwin’s greatest contribution to science is that he completed the Copernican Revolution by drawing out for biology the notion of nature as a system of matter in motion governed by natural laws. With Darwin’s discovery o...
O programie badawczym teorii inteligentnego projektu
Zgodnie z teorią inteligentnego projektu pewne zjawiska biologiczne i kosmiczne zostały zaprojektowane przez istotę inteligentną, która równie dobrze może być naturalna, jak nadnaturalna, a projekt ten jest wykrywalny na...
Second Thoughts on Naturalistic Theism and Model of Levels of Analysis: A Response to Mark Harris
I shall show that Dr. Harris’ study of biblical scholarship is treated in a very serious manner in my paper, as it is the element identifying him as a representative of naturalistic theism (NT). NT is a position that has...