Science on Trial: Exploring the Rationality of Methodological Naturalism

Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2014, Vol 11, Issue 0

Abstract

In this essay, I closely scrutinize the proposal presented in a recently edited volume entitled [b]The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence of an Intelligent Designer [/b]by J.P. Moreland. Moreland chides Christians for what he takes as their failure to understand the proper integration of their faith with secular disciplines, particularly the natural sciences. Contributors to this volume propose a „theistic science” which focuses primarily on the tactical or strategic proscription against direct reference to divine agency (methodological naturalism). These authors endorse the inclusivity principle, that is, the claim that explanations in terms of the direct and immediate activity of a divine agent may constitute a proper part of natural science. As I see it, the recommendation takes two forms: (1) it is positively irrational for the Christian engaged in natural science to remain committed to methodological naturalism, and (2) because science has no intrinsic individuating features, it is irrational for the broader scientific community to continue to resist appeal to immediate divine agency as a proper part of natural science. Specifically, I argue that the first statement is mistaken, and the second is ill-advised. The disciplinary distinction, as determined in part by methodological naturalism, is well-grounded, intrinsically valuable, and, when properly understood, a critical component of Christian inquiry. I conclude that permitting direct reference to divine agency in natural science severely undermines the overall quest for truth.

Authors and Affiliations

Robert O'Connor

Keywords

Related Articles

Artefakty zwierzęce i pozaziemskie - inteligentnie zaprojektowane?

Autor, podając przykłady ze świata zwierząt i analizując domniemane świadectwa istnienia istot pozaziemskich, dowodzi, że teoria inteligentnego projektu nie jest odrzucana współcześnie przez wzgląd na światopoglądowe upr...

God’s Chance Creation

A commentary on the paper of cardinal Christoph Schönborn, „Odnajdywanie zamysłu w przyrodzie”, [i]Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy[/i] 2005/2006, vol. 2/3, pp. 19-22.

From Gaps to God

Arguments for the existence of God that are based on design often specify an aspect of our natural world that cannot be explained by our current understanding of the laws of nature. Such a gap of knowledge is construed a...

Nowe idee w biologii ewolucyjnej: od NDMS do EES

Nowoczesna synteza neodarwinowska (NDMS — neo-Darwinian modern synthesis) przez kilkadziesiąt lat stanowiła podstawę teorii ewolucji. Okazało się jednak, że NDMS ma swoje ograniczenia, a jej ustalenia są nieaktualne w od...

Teologiczne i naukowe wyjaśnienia pochodzenia i celu zła naturalnego

Zdarzenia w rodzaju trzęsień ziemi i wyniszczających chorób często uważane są za coś złego i skłaniają do zadawania kłopotliwych pytań o Bożą dobroć. Chociaż nauka nie uznaje takich zdarzeń za złe, to jednak dostarcza pe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP142916
  • DOI -
  • Views 102
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Robert O'Connor (2014). Science on Trial: Exploring the Rationality of Methodological Naturalism. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, 11(0), 95-131. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-142916