Searching into the Evidences on the Inclusiveness of Discretionary Punishment
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2014, Vol 45, Issue 95
Abstract
Concerning the prohibited or obligatory actions for perpetrating or abandoning of which no punishment has been established, the act of determining discretionary punishment is entrusted to the Muslim judge. An important and meaningful question is raised here as to whether this kind of punishment would include all the unlawful actions and abandoning? In other words, are all legal sins and misdemeanors legally punishable or the Muslim judge would announce just a part of it as punishable? According to the generally accepted legal viewpoint, the legal judge can, if he deems it expedient, penalize (practice ta‘zīr on) the one who has perpetrated an unlawful (ḥarām) act (and some maintain that the unlawful act has to be a cardinal sin), but ta‘zīr should be less at a lower level than ḥadd (legal punishment). The renowned majority of Imāmī and Sunnī jurists have accepted this theory. In contrast, some jurists, including Muḥaqqiq Ardabīlī, have cast doubt on the judgment itself that any unlawful act deserves to be punished through ta‘zīr. Some contemporary jurists have also concluded that there is no reliable evidence that the perpetrator of any unlawful act would deserve ta‘zīr. Some have, even if accepting the judgment itself, interpreted the extent of ta‘zīr in such a way that it would include admonition, advice, reproach, and threat, as well. It is attempted in this article that while making an analytical statement of the viewpoints of the two sides, the viewpoints of the jurists who agree with this judgment to be seriously criticized and to prove with a dominant legal perspective that there is no jurisprudential or legal evidence for discretionary punishment of any unlawful act and consequently, this viewpoint is not to be easily taken as a foundation for legislation.
Authors and Affiliations
ḤAmīD Masjidsarā‘ī
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP184411
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.13834
- Views 106
- Downloads 0
Semantic Principles of Islamic Law
Paying attention to the lingual analysis of the legal concepts and propositions is one of the most important sections studied in philosophy of law. The nature of the science of law necessitates its intermingling with wor...
The Function of the Sunnīs’ Farewell Circumambulation for the Lawfulness of Women from the Shī‘ī Jurisprudence Perspective
Among the most important differences between the Sunnīs and Shī‘as is the legal obligation of the circumambulation called ṭawāf al-nisā’ in the end of the Ḥajj pilgrimage and the consequences of its non-performance. Cont...
An introduction into the impediment removal rule (the return of prohibition in case of impediment removal)
One of the most widely used rules of jurisprudence is ‘impediment removal’ often expressed by the phrase ‘when impediment is removed, the forbidden is regained.’ The application of this rule in jurisprudential matters pr...
Interference of Punishments in Multiple Offences Deserving Legal Punishment and its Challenges
If in multiple offences deserving legal punishment (ḥadd) the perpetrated offences are similar, the punishments interfere and the person is sentenced to one legal punishment. This judgment is disputable from two perspect...
Reciprocal duties and rights of owner and usurper after delivering the alternate of usurped property
Alternate of the usurped property is a compensation paid to the owner after unavailability of usurped property. The Iranian Civil Code, following the Islamic scholars' famous view, has principally accepted the payment of...