Security Strategy of Ukraine in the Context of Ethnopolitical Challenges of the Annexed Crimea
Journal Title: Українознавство - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 67
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of ethnopolitical challenges in the national security system of Ukraine, which had led to the annexation of the peninsula, and also defines political and legal mechanisms for providing ethnopolitical security for conserving territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine in the struggle for de-occupation and reintegration of Crimea. It is determined that since the 1990s, scientists focused their attention on ethnopolitical destabilizing factors in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, in particular the constant support by Russia of the Russian community of the peninsula; lobbying the idea of the “Russian World” and “genuinely Russian Crimea”; the insufficient support by Ukraine of the Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar communities, who could have opposed separatist threats. Thus, Russian ethnocultural environment did not only avoid scaling back in the years since the Soviet era but also dominated in the ethnopolitical space of Crimea. In turn, after returning to the territory, Crimean Tatars, unsatisfied with such a situation, demanded from the Ukrainian state the full vindication of their rights, including ethnocultural and property ones. Ethnocultural problems of the peninsula’s Ukrainian community were constantly ignored on the part of the authorities as in Crimea so in the official Kyiv, which contributed to the partial assimilation of the Ukrainians. To some extent, the demands of the ethnically politicized Russian majority in the peninsula were balanced by the growing ethnocultural and ethnopolitical demands of the Crimean Tatar minorities. Thus, it was possible to keep the peninsula ethnopolitically stable for many years by suspending the ethnopolitical conflict between the key ethnic communities. The article considers the problem of determining the legal status of Crimean Tatar people as the indigenous people of Ukraine in the context of the state ethnonational policy of Ukraine. It studies the contemporary state of the legal framework as for the regulation of the Crimean Tatar question and the legal status of the AR of Crimea.
Authors and Affiliations
Olena Hazizova
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP446609
- DOI 10.30840/2413-7065.2(67).2018.141732
- Views 154
- Downloads 0
Description of Slavic Countries and Peoples in «The Book of Highways and Kingdoms» by al-Bakri
The article presents fragments of geographical compilation «The Book of Highways and of Kingdoms» by al-Bakri, Andalusian Muslim geographer and historian of the 11th century. The information about countries and Slavic pe...
Proceedings of the Research and Practical Seminar «Ways of Implementing the Concept of National-Patriotic Education in the School Сurriculum»
Proceedings of the Research and Practical Seminar «Ways of Implementing the Concept of National-Patriotic Education in the School Сurriculum»
From Ideology to Revolutionary Practice: Relations of Dmytro Dontsov and Ukrainian Military Organization in the 1920s
The article analyzes the sociopolitical situation in West Ukrainian lands in the 1920s, which were occupied by the Polish Army and were incorporated in the Polish state. The Polish-Ukrainian relations of that time and th...
A Breakthrough Investigation into the Ukrainian Diaspora Studies
A Breakthrough Investigation into the Ukrainian Diaspora Studies
Military and Political Confrontation between the UPR and RSFSR in the Modern Ukrainian Historiography
The article analyzes the coverage of the first Bolshevik-Ukrainian war (December 1917 – April 1918), which began as a result of the conflict between the UPR and the RSFSR, by modern Ukrainian scientists. In the days of U...