Shared Decision-Making Regarding Place of Birth–Mission Impossible or Mission Accomplished?

Journal Title: Women's Health – Open Journal - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

Aim: To explore Dutch pregnant women’s experiences of shared-decision making about place of birth to better understand this process for midwifery care purposes. Design: Qualitative exploratory study with a constant comparison/grounded theory design. Methods: We performed semi-structured interviews, including two focus groups and eight individual interviews among 16 primarous and multiparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Consent was obtained and interviews were audiotaped and fully transcribed. The interviews were analyzed utilizing a cyclical process of coding and categorizing, following which the themes were structured based on the three-step shared-decision making model of Elwyn.1 Results: We identified the three themes according to Elwyn’s model: Choice talk, Option talk and Decision talk. We expanded the model with one additional theme: Decision ownership. The four themes explained women’s decision making process about place of birth. Women perceived shared-decision making about place of birth as a decision to be taken with their partner instead of with the midwife. Women and their partners regarded the decision about place of birth as a choice to be made as a couple and expecting parents; not as a decision in which the midwife needs to be actively involved. Women and their partners considered their options and developed a strong preference about where to give birth; even before the initial contact with the midwife was made. Involvement of the midwife occurred during the later stages of the decision-making process, where the women sought acknowledgement of their choice which was already made. Conclusion: Women considered their partners as the most and actively involved in the shareddecision making process regarding the place of birth. The women’s decision-making process about the place of birth did not fully occur during the antenatal care period. The midwife should ideally be involved before or during the early stages of pregnancy to facilitate the process.

Authors and Affiliations

Yvonne Fontein-Kuipers

Keywords

Related Articles

Depressive Symptoms, Correlates, and the Marital Relationship in Women with Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabia

The relationship between the quality of the marital relationship and depressive symptoms in married women with breast cancer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, was examined. A consecutive series of 50 women with breast cancer were...

The Medicalisation of Menstruation: Its Scope and Limits

Conventional western medicine has very determinately ‘technologized’ its approach to health and the human body. While there are many benefits evinced from this conventional orientation, there are also disconcerting liabi...

The Stigma of Rape: Gendered Victimization

The problem of rape is as old as civilization and it is a universal concern of great magnitude. Rape is classified as a violent crime in all nations and attracts strong penal action. This however has not deterred sexual...

Hormone Replacement Therapy and its Risks and Benefits for Women

There is no doubt that as both women and men age, the decline in the hormones which in their earlier years kept them vigorous and youthful has impacted dramatically on their health. Hormonal balance plays an integral rol...

If You Think Alcohol Consumption is Not Harmful, Think Again! (Part 2)

Ironically, when family and friends announce that one of their female members or a partnered couple is pregnant, the first thing that happens is that someone in a privileged position proposes that each member of the grou...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP554910
  • DOI 10.17140/ WHOJ-3-120
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Yvonne Fontein-Kuipers (2017). Shared Decision-Making Regarding Place of Birth–Mission Impossible or Mission Accomplished?. Women's Health – Open Journal, 3(2), 36-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-554910