Should active surveillance in prostate cancer patients be based on a single histological assessment?

Journal Title: Central European Journal of Urology - Year 2014, Vol 67, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction Active surveillance (AS) is always associated with a degree of uncertainty, whether or not prostate biopsy (TRUSBx) results indeed can be relied on for evaluation of cancer stage and histological grade, as the most commonly observed limitations of TRUSBx are undergrading, understaging and underestimating true prostate cancer (PCa) volume. We evaluated prostate cancer characteristics in men who could have been offered active surveillance based on clinical features and TRUSBx results, and compared them with the same patient’s histology results following their radical prostatectomy (RP). Moreover, we assessed the level of consistency in reporting TRUSBx and RP specimens by the same pathologist on two separate occasions, as well as by another independent pathologist. Material and methods All patients who underwent RP between 2005 and 2008 had their medical records reviewed retrospectively. All histological specimens were prospectively re–evaluated by the same pathologist, as well as by a second to assess for intra– and interobserver variability, respectively. Results Eight out of a total of 124 patients who underwent RP could have been offered AS on the basis of initial microscopic reports. However, there was significant intra– and interobserver variability. The differences in the histological grade of the specimens obtained from TRUSBx and RP, reported by the same pathologist and by the second pathologist were apparent in 6 and 4 cases, and in 7 and 6 patients, respectively. Conclusions We recommend that the decision about AS should be made after at least two pathologists have jointly reviewed and agreed on the TRUSBx histology results.

Authors and Affiliations

Łukasz Nyk, Tomasz Golabek, Jakub Dobruch, Michał Andrzej Skrzypczyk, Maciej Wysocki, Piotr Chłosta, Andrzej Borówka

Keywords

Related Articles

Urinary tract infections and Candida albicans

Introduction Urinary tract candidiasis is known as the most frequent nosocomial fungal infection worldwide. Candida albicans is the most common cause of nosocomial fungal urinary tract infections; however, a rapid change...

Should active surveillance in prostate cancer patients be based on a single histological assessment?

Introduction Active surveillance (AS) is always associated with a degree of uncertainty, whether or not prostate biopsy (TRUSBx) results indeed can be relied on for evaluation of cancer stage and histological grade, as t...

The cardiovascular and gastrointestinal adverse effects of cyclooxygenase inhibitors seems to be a major concern that restricts their use in the treatment of urinary bladder dysfunction

Editorial referring to the paper: Gokkaya CS, Aktas BK, Ozden C, Bulut S, Karabakan M, Erkmen AE, Memis A. Flurbiprofen alone and in combination with alfuzosin for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms. Cent Eur...

Use of Martius flap in the complex female urethral surgery

Introduction Objectives were to evaluate safety and patient reported perception of the Martius fibroadipose flap for complex female urethra reconstruction. Material and methods Patients operated with a Martius flap were...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342769
  • DOI 10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art6
  • Views 34
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Łukasz Nyk, Tomasz Golabek, Jakub Dobruch, Michał Andrzej Skrzypczyk, Maciej Wysocki, Piotr Chłosta, Andrzej Borówka (2014). Should active surveillance in prostate cancer patients be based on a single histological assessment?. Central European Journal of Urology, 67(3), 242-246. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-342769