Should all specimens taken during surgical treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia be assessedby a pathologist?

Journal Title: Central European Journal of Urology - Year 2014, Vol 67, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction In some patients submitted to transurethral resection of the prostatic (TURP) or prostatectomy (OAE) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), pathological evaluations (PE) revealed coexistence of prostate cancer (PCa) and BPH. The aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence of PCa diagnosed incidentally in prostate specimens taken during BPH surgery, to assess the need of routine PE and to define the group of patients in whom PE could be abandoned without the risk of omitting clinically significant PCa. Material and methods 968 consecutive men were subjected to surgical treatment due to BPH in Jan. 2004–Sep. 2010. Results 823 (85%) underwent TURP and 145 (15%) OAE. Incidental (Inc) PCa was diagnosed in 34(3.5%) pts. T1a and T1b stages were determined in 19 (2%) and 15 (1.5%) cases. Preoperative prostate biopsy due to abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) or digital rectal exam (DRE) was performed in 85 (8.8%) pts. Of PCa pts, 7 (20.58%) had undergone a cancer negative biopsy preoperatively. In BPH pts, 78 (8.35%) had undergone a prostate biopsy previously (p <0.01). Univariate and logit regression analyses had not revealed any correlations between age, Pv, serum PSA and frequency of IncPCa. The difference in rate of PCa diagnosed in patients with PSAD ≥0.15 and <0.15 was 8 pts (14.04%) and 20 pts (4.05%), respectively (p <0.001). Gls in those pts was >6 only in 4 cases. Conclusions Despite the fact of low PCa detection rate observed in our study, this condition was clinically relevant in 15 (1.5%) subjects. It is difficult to establish any cut off values of pts’ age, Pv, serum PSA level suggestive of negligible risk for prostate cancer.

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Andrzej Skrzypczyk, Jakub Dobruch, Łukasz Nyk, Przemysław Szostek, Stanisław Szempliński, Andrzej Borówka

Keywords

Related Articles

Adrenergic crisis due to pheochromocytoma – practical aspects. A short review

Introduction The definitive therapy in case of pheochromocytoma is complete surgical resection. Improper preoperative assessment and medical management generally places the patient at risk for complications, resulting fr...

Management and follow up of extra–adrenal phaeochromocytoma

Introduction The prevalence of phaeochromocytoma (PCC) in patients with hypertension is 0.1–0.6% and about 10% of PCCs are detected in extra–adrenal tissue. The diagnosis and therapy of this rare disease detected as a re...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342716
  • DOI 10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art2
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Andrzej Skrzypczyk, Jakub Dobruch, Łukasz Nyk, Przemysław Szostek, Stanisław Szempliński, Andrzej Borówka (2014). Should all specimens taken during surgical treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia be assessedby a pathologist?. Central European Journal of Urology, 67(3), 557-232. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-342716