Social and biological determinants of growth and development in underprivileged societies

Journal Title: Jornal de Pediatria - Year 2016, Vol 92, Issue 3

Abstract

The stimulating study by da Rocha Neves et al. (in this issue)1 addresses the role of social and biological factors in growth and development of young children in a disadvantaged society. The authors assessed a group of 92 children, aged 24–36 months, who in 2011 attended the municipal early childhood education network in a town in the Vale do Jequitinhonha region. This region in the southeast of Brazil is considered economically underprivileged. The study was restricted to children with typical development, which meant that the children did not suffer from an evident congenital or acquired disability. Growth was assessed by means of standard anthropometrics, with a focus on height-for-age, a valid tool to assess childhood malnutrition.2 Development was measured with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSITD-III),3 the gold standard to measure developmental outcome at early age. The cognitive score and the expressive language scores were used as outcome parameters. Biological risk was assessed by a few perinatal factors, such as gestational age at birth, birth weight, pregnancy complications, and the number of prenatal consultations, and a few childhood parameters, including breastfeeding, the presence of chronic diseases, infectious diseases, and hospital admissions. The social environment was documented extensively, not only by means of parental level of education, the number of siblings, and the number of people in the household, but also with standardized questionnaires to assess (a) the economic situation (with the questionnaire of the Brazilian Association of Research Companies [Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa]); (b) the quality of early childhood education (with the Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale – Revised); (c) the quality of the home environment (with the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Inventory); and (d) the quality of the neighborhood (with a self-developed questionnaire including questions on accessibility and quality of services).

Authors and Affiliations

Mijna Hadders-Algra

Keywords

Related Articles

Sweat conductivity and coulometric quantitative test in neonatal cystic fibrosis screening

Objective To compare the results obtained with the sweat test using the conductivity method and coulometric measurement of sweat chloride in newborns (NBs) with suspected cystic fibrosis (CF) in the neonatal screening pr...

Nutritional management and postoperative prognosis of newborns submitted to primary surgical repair of gastroschisis

Objective Gastroschisis is a defect of the abdominal wall, resulting in congenital evisceration and requiring neonatal intensive care, early surgical correction, and parenteral nutrition. This study evaluated newborns wi...

Interventions to reduce accidents in childhood: a systematic review

Objective To review the literature on interventions planned to prevent the incidence of injuries in childhood. Source of data The PubMed, Web of Science, and Bireme databases were searched by two independent reviewers,...

The pediatrician's role in the first thousand days of the child: the pursuit of healthy nutrition and development

Objectives To describe the concept of the first 1000 days, its importance for health, and actions to be implemented, particularly by pediatricians, in order to attain healthy nutrition and development. Sources A nonsyst...

Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children

Objective End-stage renal disease is a health problem that consumes public and private resources. This study aimed to identify the cost of hemodialysis (either daily or conventional hemodialysis) and transplantation in c...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP523331
  • DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2016.02.001
  • Views 54
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mijna Hadders-Algra (2016). Social and biological determinants of growth and development in underprivileged societies. Jornal de Pediatria, 92(3), 217-219. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-523331