Social movements and political outcomes: why both ends fail to meet

Abstract

The relationships between social movement challenges and political outcomes remain strongly underresearched in the field of social movements. Here, we use the labels “social” and “political” in a broad sense to comprise many types of challenges and many types of outcomes, such as economic and social outcomes for specific movements as well as general policy outcomes. Four theories are crucial for understanding successful mobilization of social movements: relative deprivation, resource mobilization, framing, and the theoretical figure of the opening political opportunity structure. Political outcomes, at least in democratic political systems, are usually the result of a parallelogram of different claims and means of influencing outcomes, in short, of compromises. Here, we list various forms of outcomes, from successful acceptance of movement demands to part-time successes or entire failures, and also the various strategies incumbents have in dealing with social movement challenges. Researchers usually have focused on the individual and structural conditions of the emergence of social movements but less so on the conditions of processing social movement demands and the outcomes for movements themselves, for the electorate and for policy changes. Consequently, there is little research available that would meet the requirements of an adequate research design in view of the numerous factors spelled out here as a theoretical control list. The idea of a response hierarchy of incumbents is suggested as a sort of a dispositional concept for further, more consolidated, research in this area. Also the notion of cycles of various sorts has to be kept in mind in order to avoid misjudging of both, the persistence of social movements over time, and their eventual successes and failures.

Authors and Affiliations

Ekkard Zimmermann

Keywords

Related Articles

Instytucja referendum ogólnopaństwowego w Republice Białorusi po 1991 roku

Instytucja referendum jest jednym z kilku przykładów demokracji bezpośredniej stanowiącej przeciwieństwo, ale jednocześnie uzupełnienie demokracji przedstawicielskiej. W artykule podjęto temat zastosowania tej instytucji...

Analiza u źródeł poznania teorii polityki i metodologii badań politologicznych w Polsce. Czy można i należy odseparować naukę od ideologii?

W artykule przedstawiono analizę pism teoretycznych oraz metodologicznych polskich badaczy humanistycznych i społecznych, odwołujących się w swoich badaniach do założeń metodologii marksistowskiej. Polskie tradycje teore...

Charakter narodowy Polaków w wybranych syntezach historii i w myśli politycznej Romana Dmowskiego

Zrozumienie istoty charakteru narodowego jest konieczne dla człowieka do prawidłowego pojmowania rzeczywistości społecznej. Ze względu na różne czynniki (zewnętrzne, wewnętrzne) ludzie rozwijają się w niejednorodnym temp...

Direct Democracy and Its Tools in the Face of Use of New Technologies

Given the dynamic development of the new media, in particular the Internet, the social, economic and cultural fields of modern life are undergoing changes as well as many others. New technologies have also had an impact...

Towards “global zero”: the role of the Holy See in the campaign on nuclear disarmament

On 7 July 2017 at the UN headquarters in New York the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was adopted, the first multilateral legally-binding instrument for nuclear disarmament negotiated in the last twenty year...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP297725
  • DOI -
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ekkard Zimmermann (2015). Social movements and political outcomes: why both ends fail to meet. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio K: Politologia, 0(1), 31-49. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-297725