Social Perspective of Sport. (Difficulties With) Defining the Issue and Its Discourse
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SOCJOLOGII JAKOŚCIOWEJ - Year 2015, Vol 11, Issue 2
Abstract
The main aspect of social popularity of sport is its specific discourse. Sport terms are used to describe many phenomena from other social fields. It is easy to find many examples—“showing red card,” “penalty,” “faster—higher—stronger,” “fair play.” Sport delivers the rules of rivalry, offers particular ways for cognitive structuring of the world (rankings, records, measurements), emphasizes the role of corporality, and underlines the need for transgression. Nevertheless, notwithstanding its discursive embedment, it remains a phenomenon difficult to define within the context of social sciences. This text represents an attempt to elaborate this kind of perspective. The definition at hand is supposed to consider the internal diversity of sport. On the other hand, it should provide the researchers with empirical research tools. The paper consists of introduction and three parts. Firstly, the social specificity of sport is described. Secondly, two different ways of defining sport are introduced—attributive and contextual. Finally, the third way of defining sport is suggested—structured contextualism.
Authors and Affiliations
Przemysław Nosal
Wojciech Klimczyk "Erotyzm ponowoczesny"
Marc Singleton "Yoga Body. The origin of Modern Posture Practice"
Book Review: Ruth Wodak, Michał Krzyżanowski (2008) (eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, Palgrave Macmillan
Book Review
Reciprocity (?) of Perspectives in the World of Classical Music. Autoethnography of Sociologist-Observer and Japanese Language Translator
This paper lays out advantages and disadvantages of the practical use of analytic autoethnorgaphy (Leon Anderson 2006) in qualitative research focused on professional careers of artists in art world (Howard Becker 1982),...
Medytacja i futbolowa gorączka. O potencjale, ograniczeniach i domknięciach autoetnografii
Tekst podejmuje dyskusję w sporze pomiędzy przedstawicielami nurtu „sugestywnego” i „analitycznego” w prowadzeniu badań autoetnograficznych. Główne założenie tekstu mówi, że te dwa podejścia można ze sobą łączyć, wykorzy...