Spinal versus general anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy: A prospective, randomized study

Journal Title: Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Year 2020, Vol 17, Issue 3

Abstract

Objective: To compare spinal anesthesia (SA) with general anesthesia (GA) in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery regarding anesthetic parameters and patient satisfaction together with an assessment of total oxidant, antioxidant levels, and Oxidative Stress index (OSI). Materials and Methods: Sixty patients who were planned to undergo gynecologic laparoscopy were randomized into group G (GA) and group S (SA). Demographics, adverse events and anesthetic parameters were recorded before induction, after induction, and at the 5th, 10th, 15th, 30th, 60th, 90th, and 120th minutes. Patients and surgeons completed questionnaires. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant level (TOL), and OSI were measured. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters except heart rate at 30th minute and mean arteral pressure at 10th, 15th, 30th, and 60th minute (p<0.05). The postoperative arterial blood pH value was lower in group S (p=0.021). Intraoperative hypotension was lower in group S (p=0.038). There was more intraoperative hypotension in group S when compared with group G (p=0.038). Postoperative analgesic consumption was higher and onset of postoperative pain was shorter in group G (p=0.001 for both). There was no difference between the groups in terms of patient and surgeon satisfaction. There was no difference in terms of TAC, TOL, and OSI between the groups (p=0.862, p=0.940, and p=0.728, respectively). Conclusion: SA may become a reliable alternative to GA in gynecologic laparoscopy when hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, patient and surgeon satisfaction, as well as total oxidant, antioxidant levels, and OSI are considered.

Authors and Affiliations

Berna Kaya Uğur1, Lütfiye Pirbudak1, Ebru Öztürk2, Özcan Balat2, Mete Gürol Uğur2

Keywords

Related Articles

Laparoscopic hemi-hysterectomy in a noncommunicating uterine horn: The critical steps to be considered

Various congenital anomalies of the female tract such as agenesis, vertical or lateral fusion failure, and canalization failure occur when the normal development of the Müllerian duct disrupts in any stage of development...

Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training

Detailed knowledge of anatomy is an essential part of surgical practice. However, there are many drawbacks in anatomy education that make many residents feel inadequate when they start performing surgeries. Cadaveric dis...

How to perform and interpret the lung ultrasound by the obstetricians in pregnant women during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Objective: Evidence for the use of lung ultrasound scan (LUS) examinations in coronavirus 2019 pneumonia is rapidly growing. The safe and non-ionizing nature of LUS drew attention, particularly for pregnant women. This s...

The impact of vaginal cone therapy on stress urinary incontinence compared with transobturator tape

Objective: To emphasize the efficiency of vaginal cone (VC) therapy in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through a comparison with transobturator tape (TOT). Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled st...

Repeated dose of prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert when the first dose fails

Objective: To compare the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of patients treated with repeated-dose prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) vaginal insert when the first dose fails. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP688912
  • DOI 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.28928
  • Views 114
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Berna Kaya Uğur1, Lütfiye Pirbudak1, Ebru Öztürk2, Özcan Balat2, Mete Gürol Uğur2 (2020). Spinal versus general anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy: A prospective, randomized study. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 17(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-688912