Spiritual Occlusion and Systemic Integrity: Legal Evaluations of Due Process Protections and Freedom of Religious Expression and Practices Safeguards

Journal Title: Religions - Year 2018, Vol 9, Issue 6

Abstract

As is the case with other constitutionally protected rights, the freedom of religion is not unlimited nor without restriction or constraint. Rather, the courts have long held that the state may have legitimate reasons for placing reasonable restrictions on the otherwise free exercise of religious practice. The courts have also held that the state cannot restrict religious practice in a capricious or gratuitous manner. However, the courts have also held that individuals have a constitutional right to due process legal protections. In many instances, these two freedoms exist independently of each other. In instances when they intersect, conflict may result from one right seeking hegemony over the other. In instances such as these, the courts may have to resolve conflicts by establishing legal principles and precedents regarding which of these constitutional protections will be granted contextual prominence over the other. Thus far, the legal evaluation of this important question has been confused at best and contradictory at worst. This has resulted in a number of substantive outcomes that pose significant challenges to the practice and application of both rights and an underlying avoidance of broader constitutional questions.

Authors and Affiliations

Jason R. Jolicoeur and Amy Memmer

Keywords

Related Articles

Beggar-Thy-Neighbour vs. Danube Basin Strategy: Habsburg Economic Networks in Interwar Europe

After the dissolution of the Habsburg Empire, leaders in successor states were eager to become economically independent from the former capital Vienna. They therefore quickly implemented a set of neomercantilistic meas...

Fully Human and Fully Divine: The Birth of Christ and the Role of Mary

The task given to us for this article was to offer theological responses to, “Can modern biology interpret the mystery of the birth of Christ?” by Giuseppe Benagiano and Bruno Dallapiccola. We are female Protestant the...

Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Religions in 2014

The editors of Religions would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2014: Acevedo, Gabriel A. Ajrouch, Kristine J. Anbar, Ran Angeles, Vivienne Avishai, Or...

Glocalization and Transnationalization in (neo)-Mayanization Processes: Ethnographic Case Studies from Mexico and Guatemala

In this article, the author focuses on the field of neo-Mayanity and its current transformations. She analyzes these transformations using a historico-ethnographic approach, which includes two phases. The first one con...

Abraham Lincoln: God’s “Instrument”

This paper examines one example of a spiritual hero, Abraham Lincoln, to reflect on issues about spiritual development, to connect spiritual development to character, and to indicate in what ways moral and religious de...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP26034
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9060173
  • Views 345
  • Downloads 11

How To Cite

Jason R. Jolicoeur and Amy Memmer (2018). Spiritual Occlusion and Systemic Integrity: Legal Evaluations of Due Process Protections and Freedom of Religious Expression and Practices Safeguards. Religions, 9(6), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-26034