Spirituality: Explicit and Implicit. Hindrances to the Scientific Status of Research on Spirituality

Journal Title: Roczniki Psychologiczne - Year 2013, Vol 16, Issue 3

Abstract

Although spirituality is a popular subject of research in many fields of science about man today, there still are problems with defining it. Their causes, at least in psychology, though unfounded, include distortions reflecting the scientist's personal bias: apologetic on the one hand and anti-fideist on the other. Bias of the first type often stems from the beliefs, held by the author of a given concept, that go beyond the paradigm of science. This refers to two concepts recognizing the existence of the spiritual dimension of the human being as substantially different from the psy­chological dimension: V. E. Frankl's logotheory, being a concept of the spiritual dimension as the source of the need for meaning, and D. Helminiak's concept, according to which spirituality is the realization of the principle of authentic transcendence of the self. Such concepts are referred to as explicit. However, there are also explicit concepts of spirituality acceptable in academic psycho­logy; the described example is the concept of spirituality developed by J. Averill. Bias of the second type dominated Western psychology for a long time. It may be the cause for the term "spirituality" not being used by the authors of the concepts whose distinctive features appear in this article. These are the implicit concepts of spirituality. Their three examples are: Terror Management Theory (developed by T. Pyszczyñski, J. Greenberg, and S. Solomon), the Meaning Maintenance Model (authored mainly by T. Proulx and S. Heine), and Józef Kozielecki's trans-gressive concept of man. They include similar elements, but the transgressive concept appears to be the most useful. The conclusion contains proposals of research using the ideas of meaning, coping with absurdity, and the form of transgression as ones that lead to spiritual transformation.

Authors and Affiliations

Paweł Socha

Keywords

Related Articles

Dobro odbiorcy w kodeksach etyczno-zawodowych psychologów: Głos w dyskusji

Punktem wyjścia dla sformułowanych uwag w moim wystąpieniu jest artykuł Katarzyny Sikory, otwierający dyskusję na tematy etyczne związane z zawodem psychologa. Sam artykuł jest, w mojej ocenie, solidnym przedstawieniem t...

Mechanizmy zdrowia i zaburzeń psychicznych w teorii dialogowego Ja

 Artykuł zawiera przegląd literatury na temat mechanizmów zdrowia i zaburzeń psychicznych w ujęciu teorii dialogowego Ja. W pierwszej części przedstawiono najważniejsze twierdzenia teorii dialogowego Ja, mające znac...

Odpowiedź na polemiki

W dyskusji nad moim artykułem pojawiło się kilka ważnych kwestii. Pomimo różnic poglądów, uczestnicy dyskusji byli zgodni co do tego, że chociaż zdefiniowanie dobra odbiorcy ma zasadni­cze znaczenie dla etyki zawodu, to...

The chameleon effect and the stereotypes of nonbelievers held by religious persons

The study aimed to verify whether the chameleon effect can be a used as an effective technique of stereotype modification. It has already been shown that individuals whose behaviors were mi­micked showed an increased pos...

Hope and the affective tone of narratives as correlates of posttraumatic growth in people who have lost motor ability

In the article we present data collected from 50 people who lost their motor ability in accidents. Analyses of narrative interviews conducted with the accident victims suggest that a positive affec-tive tone of narrative...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP127457
  • DOI -
  • Views 57
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Paweł Socha (2013). Spirituality: Explicit and Implicit. Hindrances to the Scientific Status of Research on Spirituality. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 16(3), 369-413. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-127457