Spirituality: Explicit and Implicit. Hindrances to the Scientific Status of Research on Spirituality
Journal Title: Roczniki Psychologiczne - Year 2013, Vol 16, Issue 3
Abstract
Although spirituality is a popular subject of research in many fields of science about man today, there still are problems with defining it. Their causes, at least in psychology, though unfounded, include distortions reflecting the scientist's personal bias: apologetic on the one hand and anti-fideist on the other. Bias of the first type often stems from the beliefs, held by the author of a given concept, that go beyond the paradigm of science. This refers to two concepts recognizing the existence of the spiritual dimension of the human being as substantially different from the psychological dimension: V. E. Frankl's logotheory, being a concept of the spiritual dimension as the source of the need for meaning, and D. Helminiak's concept, according to which spirituality is the realization of the principle of authentic transcendence of the self. Such concepts are referred to as explicit. However, there are also explicit concepts of spirituality acceptable in academic psychology; the described example is the concept of spirituality developed by J. Averill. Bias of the second type dominated Western psychology for a long time. It may be the cause for the term "spirituality" not being used by the authors of the concepts whose distinctive features appear in this article. These are the implicit concepts of spirituality. Their three examples are: Terror Management Theory (developed by T. Pyszczyñski, J. Greenberg, and S. Solomon), the Meaning Maintenance Model (authored mainly by T. Proulx and S. Heine), and Józef Kozielecki's trans-gressive concept of man. They include similar elements, but the transgressive concept appears to be the most useful. The conclusion contains proposals of research using the ideas of meaning, coping with absurdity, and the form of transgression as ones that lead to spiritual transformation.
Authors and Affiliations
Paweł Socha
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP127457
- DOI -
- Views 82
- Downloads 0
Granice duchowości – perspektywa druga – Kwestionariusz Sfery Duchowej
Badanie duchowej sfery człowieka nastręcza wiele problemów metodologicznych. Do tej pory znacznie łatwiej było badać religijność mającą więcej jednoznacznych, udokumentowanych wskaźników behawioralnych. Mimo to badacze p...
Self-Complexity and the Sense of Identity
The article presents an attempt at an empirical analysis of the relation between self-concept differentiation and the sense of identity. Patricia Linville's concept of self-complexity and a multidimensional approach to...
Correcting Emotions in Psychotherapy
The aim of the article is to discuss the assumptions regarding the principles of working with emotions in psychotherapy in the light of contemporary knowledge about emotions. In the first part, we present the basic conce...
Comment on Katarzyna Sikora’s article: Client Welfare in Psychologists’ Ethics Codes
In her article, Katarzyna Sikora presents a well supported perspective on the meaning of caring for the client's welfare as well as on how this concept is included in psychology ethics codes and in declarations of ethica...
Sprawozdanie z VIII Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Naukowej „Jakość życia w pracy i poza nią"