Spór o możliwość wykrywania projektu w naukach przyrodniczych

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Controversy over the possibility of detecting design in natural sciences According to intelligent design theory, certain biological and cosmic phenomena are designed by an intelligent being and this design is scientifically detectable. However, critics refuse to regard this theory as scientific, thereby suggesting that it does not deserve serious discussion in scientific circles. The article presents main methodological objections to intelligent design theory, indicating its unscientific or pseudoscientific character and impossibility of scientific design detection (at least in specific research areas). Critics try to show that this theory: 1) violates the principle of methodological naturalism (and thus that it is a supernatural, creationist, religious concept); 2) is empirically untestable; 3) it does not invoke natural laws, says nothing about the designer and the designing mechanism; 4) it does not offer predictions; 5) it is an argument from ignorance, and 6) it does not lead to fruitful research program and hence is not useful for science. These objections will be analyzed from the perspective of methodological thesis of design theorists that the sufficient condition of design inference are the characteristic effects (signs, traces) leaved by the activity of the designer, which indicate the final cause, although they do not have to be the basis for determining the designer’s identity. If this thesis is sound, then the objections that intelligent design theory is not scientific are rebutted or weakened. Moreover, it turns out that, basically, detecting design of supernatural beings does not differ from detecting design of natural beings. For that reason, there is no qualitative difference between these two procedures and both can be regarded as scientific.

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Sagan

Keywords

Related Articles

La voluntad como primer motor creado en Francisco Suárez

The will as first mover created in Francisco Suárez The aim of this paper is to show that Francisco Suarez’s claim that the will is the prime mover of the human actions is grounded in his own metaphysical system. For th...

El territorio de la espiritualidad naturalizada

(The territory of Naturalized Spirituality) The change of territory from religion to spirituality in our secular societies has given rise to the so-called naturalized spirituality within the naturalist tradition. We cri...

Why minds cannot be received, but are created by brains

There is no controversy in psychology or brain sciences that brains create mind and consciousness. Doubts and opinions to the contrary are quite frequently expressed in non-scientific publications. In particular the idea...

Cyborg and Religious? Technonature and Technoculture

We are all aware that our idea of natural/unnatural has been changing over the centuries. According to Donna Haraway, we must exit the maze of dualisms that has marred the relationships between human and non-human nature...

Il costante progredire della frontiera tra teologia e scienza: “Fisica”

On constant movement of frontiers between Theology and Science: Physics Pope Benedict XVI wrote in 1979 in “Four sermons on the Creation of world” that scientific discoveries cause a kind of retreat of the faith on “def...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP167868
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2015.009
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dariusz Sagan (2015). Spór o możliwość wykrywania projektu w naukach przyrodniczych. Scientia et Fides, 3(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-167868