Struggle against corruption in Ukraine and China: comparative characteristics of some aspects

Abstract

One of the most popular and discussed topics in the social and political life of Ukraine in recent years is the problem of combating corruption. In the Ukrainian state, various specialized bodies have been set up for this, a lot of activists have appeared, Western partners are allocating solid amounts of money for the struggle, and many politicians have learned to use the topic in their political interests. In China the fight against corruption is one of the priorities of the domestic policy of the country's leadership, however, the methods and system for neutralizing corruption ties differ significantly from Ukrainian counterparts. The purpose of this article is a comparative analysis of historical experience and the actual situation in the anti-corruption policy of Ukraine and China. First of all, it should be noted that the initiative of creating anti-corruption bodies in China did not come from outside, as in Ukraine, but from the party leadership itself. Both in Ukraine and in China, a part of civil society, which regularly opposes corruption, should continue to have the support of representatives of the authorities. If we are talking about China, then the top party leaders of the Chinese state highlight the fight against corruption (or as it is called in China with «decay») as a priority. In Ukraine, to a large extent, due to tough pressure and under serious supervision of Western partners of Ukraine, the formation of an anti-corruption system is taking place. In the existing Chinese system of fighting corruption, one important specificity is hidden: the communist partisanship of many civil servants. This also dictates the need for the functioning of the relevant party commissions and bodies responsible for party discipline. However, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of the CPC (ACB), for example, investigates corruption crimes not only of the CPC members, but also of any official in general. In Ukraine, in view of the absence of the dominant position of any one party, there are no special party commissions of state significance, as in China

Authors and Affiliations

А. И. Бузаров

Keywords

Related Articles

Circumstances refer to criminal responsibility for development of smokers: current state and prospects of improvement

The circumstances that increase the criminal liability for the deprivation of minors are the commission of perjury against a minor or committed by family members or close relatives, a person assigned responsibility for t...

Сonditions and factors of separatism spreading in Ukraine: ethno-national aspect

Opposition to separatist tendencies in Ukraine is impossible without studying the ethnic composition and dynamics of ethnopolitical development of the country’s regions. Minimization of the conflict-related potential of...

Features of the system of environmental standards in accordance with the legislation of Ukraine

The article analyzes the system of environmental standards of Ukraine. The scientific views and norms of legislation concerning classification and legal nature of standards are analyzed. Differentiation of certain types...

Migration issue in the political discourse of the modern Ukraine.

It’s explored migration issues and the concept of migration policy and strategy for its further development in the frame work of activities of the leading political parties of Ukraine. It’s explored the concept of furthe...

Internet piracy as a rational choice: evidence from the Becker model and J. S. Coleman’s conception of micro-to-macro transitions

According to expert estimation, 33% of informal sector of Ukrainian economy is shaped by piracy. Special 301 reports on copyright protection argue that Ukraine has serious problems with legal regulation of copyright prot...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP658193
  • DOI -
  • Views 59
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

А. И. Бузаров (2018). Struggle against corruption in Ukraine and China: comparative characteristics of some aspects. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 59-63. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-658193