Students’ Common Errors in Solving Routine & Non-Routine Problems: A Mixed Method Analysis

Abstract

This research was conducted to identify errors committed by students in solving word problems, determine their possible causes and propose corrective measures for classroom teaching. The analysis was centered on the five errors adopted from Newman’s Error Analysis Guide namely: reading, comprehension, transformation, process, and encoding. The study used a mixed-method research design. In collecting errors, the students were given a series of test questions. The results of the tests were compared and the specific error patterns along with the probable sources were descriptively investigated. Two weeks after the test, students were interviewed to identify their misconceptions and their reasoning. In the interview process, students were asked to explain their thinking while they were doing the same problems again. Some prompting questions were asked to facilitate this process and to clarify more about students’ claims. The data gathered were treated statistically using frequency count, mean percentage, and test concerning two means. Findings reveal that some of the common errors were seen to be persistent and the sources from which they derive were not consistent. Thus, the students’ errors occurred in varied ways in problem-solving situations. Analysis of error patterns led to the conclusion that the students have difficulty on algebraic symbolism and analysis of the problem. Their inability to deduce the correct meaning of mathematical statements further create a chain of errors on succeeding steps required of a mathematical word problem. The conclusions drawn from this investigation strongly justify the needs to recognize and to develop critical and analytical thinking of the students. That is, students must be expose in solving non-routine problems in order to provide them an opportunity to develop higher-order thinking in the process of understanding, analysis, exploration, and application of mathematical concepts.

Authors and Affiliations

Michael Angelo A. Legarde,

Keywords

Related Articles

Get Ready To Be Techy: Struggles of Senior Citizen Teachers in the Utilization of Technology in the Classroom

The study was conducted to determine the struggles of senior citizen teachers during the S.Y. 2021 - 2022. The descriptive qualitative method as research design was used and an in-depth interview was utilized in data col...

Pupils’ Reading Distraction and Confidence

Reading distractions is something to be eliminated to help pupils improve their comprehension to develop their reading confidence. This study aimed to determine the pupils’ level of reading distractions and confidence an...

Constructing A Model of Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Internal Auditors at Public Non-Business Units in Vietnam

The article presented the concepts of internal auditors, public non-business units and some related concepts. In order to meet the goal of constructing a model of factors affecting internal audit effectiveness, the resea...

Organoleptic Evaluation of Mixed Powdered Cotton Fruit (Sandoricum Koetjape) and Rattan Fruit (Calamus Manillensis) as Souring Agent

The study focused on the development, organoleptic evaluation, and marketability of Mixed Powdered Cotton Fruit and Rattan Fruit as Souring Agent. This Product development research included two major phases: (1) Vacuum/S...

Relationship between Age, Employment Status, and Availability of Sports Infrastructure on Motivation to Exercise in Yogyakarta State University Education Personnel

This research aims to determine: (1) the correlation between age and motivation for doing sports, (2) the correlation between the employment status and motivation for doing sports, (3) the correlation between the availab...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP705603
  • DOI 10.47191/ijmra/v5-i2-42
  • Views 130
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael Angelo A. Legarde, (2022). Students’ Common Errors in Solving Routine & Non-Routine Problems: A Mixed Method Analysis. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 5(02), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-705603