Study of the Effect of Amlodipine, Atenolol, Enalapril and Losartan in Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine, atenolol, enalapril and losartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Research design and method: This study was conducted in medicine department of tertiary care teaching hospital. This was prospective, open labelled, observational, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients aged 30-60 years, newly diagnosed as mild to moderate hypertension were enrolled in the study. Pretreatmentevaluation of all the patients was done. Detailed clinical history, physical examination and routine laboratory investigations were done. Eligible patients were randomized to receive Amlodipine 2.5/5 mg, Atenolol 25/ 50 mg, Enalapril5/ 10 mg, Losartan 25/50 mg and followed them for 12 weeks, patient’svisits scheduled at 2 weeks interval. Primary efficacy end point was reduction in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Safety was assessed in terms of systemic adverse events both subjective and objective (clinical and biochemical examinations). Results: Total 154 patients were enrolled, patients’ demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were comparable in all treatment groups. After 12 weeks of treatment the reduction in mean systolic blood pressure were 22.55±7.74, 21±7.94, 20.35±5.48, 22.61±8.41. Reduction in mean diastolic blood pressure were 13.11±4.31, 10.11±3.24, 11.5±3.39, 12.72±3.38. The change in heart rate was 84.22 ± 5.71 to 85.56 ± 5.81, 83.27 ± 5.72 to 69.05 ± 7.68, 84 ± 6.17 to 85.72±5.47, 82.33 ± 7.15 to 83.5±7.54. The change in average serum potassium levels 3.81 ± 0.39 to 3.79 ± 0.36, 3.79 ± 0.33 to 3.69 ± 0.22, 3.72 ± 0.35 to 4.08 ± 0.38, 3.74 ± 0.40 to 3.81 ± 0.27. Adverse events percentage was 38.88 percent, 36.11 percent, 36.11 percent and 13.88 percent in all 4 study group respectively. Conclusion: Amlodipine, Atenolol, Enalapril, and Losartan are equal efficacious to reduce SBP and DBP, whereas losartan is better tolerated and comparatively safer than amlodipine, atenolol and enalapril in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors and Affiliations

Ujwala P. Gawali

Keywords

Related Articles

Biodiesel: A Most Feasible Option Produced from Microalgae over Petro-Diesel

ue to continuous use of present source(fossil fuel) mainly cause the pollution to the environment and also negative effect on availability of the oil reservoirs necessitates developing renewable fuels to rep...

Phytochemical Screening of Folklore Medicine and Its Constituent Plants for Controlling Jaundice

The present study is focused on the use of plants species to control jaundice in Nalgonda district and providing details about the plants and their parts used as folklore medicine by the ethnic groups. Preliminary phytoc...

Biometric Another Way of User Authentication

Biometric system is a pattern recognition system that recognizes the user‘s identity through their physical or behavioral traits. In this work, an attempt has been made to show you that how the biometric authentication s...

Experimental Investigation of Drill Tool on GFRP Composites

Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic are blended mixtures of two or more constituents whose properties differ substantially. Fibre reinforced polyester (FRP), commonly used to construct aircraft bodies or ships, is widely used...

Result Analysis for Data hiding in Motion Vectors of Compressed Video Based on Steganography

This thesis apply steganography algorithm in a video. In earlier steganography method spatial or transformed domain is used for data hiding. But in future method we are using compressed video to hide the secrete message;...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP241965
  • DOI -
  • Views 66
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ujwala P. Gawali (2015). Study of the Effect of Amlodipine, Atenolol, Enalapril and Losartan in Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension. International journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 2(8), 3107-3115. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-241965